THE CONCEPTUAL FRAUD OF REPRESENTATION: THE IRRESPONSIBLE USE OF THE TERM DEMOCRACY AS A MASK FOR INSTITUTIONAL COLLAPSE

ABSTRACT Contemporary political debate and global media narratives repeatedly incur a devastating terminological fallacy: qualifying the collapse of the representative system as a "crisis of democracy." This analysis demonstrates that identifying representation with democracy constitutes an untenable oxymoron and an act of profound intellectual irresponsibility. Democracy—scientifically understood as the direct and active inclusion of the citizenry in state decision-making through the referendum, the plebiscite, the public forum, the popular consultation, and popular election by lot (sortition) — has never entered the historical stage. All institutional crises, ethical degradation, party tyrannies, and warlike conflagrations erroneously attributed to "democracy" are, in reality, the legitimate and exclusive offspring of the representative system. Perpetuating this confusion is not a mere linguistic error, but a mechanism of ideological manipulation that seeks to protect the reigning partitocracy at the expense of defaming the only real path to human emancipation: Direct Participation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23814079
Primary Topic
Political Theory and Democracy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE CONCEPTUAL FRAUD OF REPRESENTATION: THE IRRESPONSIBLE USE OF THE TERM DEMOCRACY AS A MASK FOR INSTITUTIONAL COLLAPSE

Launi merengue
3 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Political Theory and Democracy
article

THE CONCEPTUAL FRAUD OF REPRESENTATION: THE IRRESPONSIBLE USE OF THE TERM DEMOCRACY AS A MASK FOR INSTITUTIONAL COLLAPSE

Launi merengue
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Contemporary political debate and global media narratives repeatedly incur a devastating terminological fallacy: qualifying the collapse of the representative system as a "crisis of democracy." This analysis demonstrates that identifying representation with democracy constitutes an untenable oxymoron and an act of profound intellectual irresponsibility. Democracy—scientifically understood as the direct and active inclusion of the citizenry in state decision-making through the referendum, the plebiscite, the public forum, the popular consultation, and popular election by lot (sortition) — has never entered the historical stage. All institutional crises, ethical degradation, party tyrannies, and warlike conflagrations erroneously attributed to "democracy" are, in reality, the legitimate and exclusive offspring of the representative system. Perpetuating this confusion is not a mere linguistic error, but a mechanism of ideological manipulation that seeks to protect the reigning partitocracy at the expense of defaming the only real path to human emancipation: Direct Participation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Theory and Democracy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
THE CONCEPTUAL FRAUD OF REPRESENTATION: THE IRRESPONSIBLE USE OF THE TERM DEMOCRACY AS A MASK FOR INSTITUTIONAL COLLAPSE — Launi merengue · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS