Neuromuscular control optimization and injury risk attenuation in football players

Purpose. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of Speed, Agility, and Quickness (SAQ) Training and Functional Rehabilitation (FR) on Neuromuscular Control and Injury Risk of Football Players. Materials & Methods. This study included thirty male football players aged 18-25 years from SRM Institute of Science and Technology and they were randomly divided into two equal groups; Functional Rehabilitation Group (n=15) and SAQ Group (n=15). The intervention lasted 12 weeks, with training sessions conducted three times per week. Neuromuscular control was assessed using the Y-balance Test, whereas Injury risk was measured via the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Data were analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with pre-test scores included as covariates. The level of significance was set at p<0.05. Results. The results show that both groups have gained significantly after the intervention. The SAQ group has exhibited higher gain in neuromuscular control where the Y-balance score increased from 82.10±3.15 to 91.84±2.76 whereas in the Functional Rehabilitation group it increased from 82.45±3.21 to 87.92±3.05. On the other hand, the Functional Rehabilitation group demonstrated a greater improvement in FMS scores from 13.20±1.10 to 16.75±1.18 when compared to the SAQ group which gained only from 13.35±1.05 to 15.32±1.26. The results show that there were significant differences between the two groups where the group effect was significant (F=6.21, p=0.019, ηp²= 0.19) in Y-balance scores and (F=5.63, p=0.024, ηp²=0.17) in FMS scores. Conclusions. Both SAQ training and Functional Rehabilitation were found to be efficient ways of improving neuromuscular control and decreasing injury risk. SAQ training produced greater improvements in neuromuscular control, whereas Functional Rehabilitation produced greater improvements in FMS scores. The combination of both programs would likely be optimal for football players.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical rehabilitation and recreational health technologies
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2026-11(5).03
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuromuscular control optimization and injury risk attenuation in football players

Edi Setiawan, Yuliya Kalmykova, Chandrababu Suresh, Swamynathan Sanjaykumar et al.
2 links
Physical rehabilitation and recreational health technologies
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Neuromuscular control optimization and injury risk attenuation in football players

Edi Setiawan, Yuliya Kalmykova, Chandrababu Suresh, Swamynathan Sanjaykumar, Ashokan Praveen
article en

Abstract

Purpose. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of Speed, Agility, and Quickness (SAQ) Training and Functional Rehabilitation (FR) on Neuromuscular Control and Injury Risk of Football Players. Materials & Methods. This study included thirty male football players aged 18-25 years from SRM Institute of Science and Technology and they were randomly divided into two equal groups; Functional Rehabilitation Group (n=15) and SAQ Group (n=15). The intervention lasted 12 weeks, with training sessions conducted three times per week. Neuromuscular control was assessed using the Y-balance Test, whereas Injury risk was measured via the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Data were analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with pre-test scores included as covariates. The level of significance was set at p<0.05. Results. The results show that both groups have gained significantly after the intervention. The SAQ group has exhibited higher gain in neuromuscular control where the Y-balance score increased from 82.10±3.15 to 91.84±2.76 whereas in the Functional Rehabilitation group it increased from 82.45±3.21 to 87.92±3.05. On the other hand, the Functional Rehabilitation group demonstrated a greater improvement in FMS scores from 13.20±1.10 to 16.75±1.18 when compared to the SAQ group which gained only from 13.35±1.05 to 15.32±1.26. The results show that there were significant differences between the two groups where the group effect was significant (F=6.21, p=0.019, ηp²= 0.19) in Y-balance scores and (F=5.63, p=0.024, ηp²=0.17) in FMS scores. Conclusions. Both SAQ training and Functional Rehabilitation were found to be efficient ways of improving neuromuscular control and decreasing injury risk. SAQ training produced greater improvements in neuromuscular control, whereas Functional Rehabilitation produced greater improvements in FMS scores. The combination of both programs would likely be optimal for football players.

Physical rehabilitation and recreational health technologiesVol. 11(5)
University of Calicut (IN), SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Cirebon (ID), V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon