SAE Marriage Theory Paper 1: Joined / SAE 婚姻论 Paper 1: 眷属

SAE Marriage Theory Paper 1. This record holds the Chinese text and its English edition. The English edition is an independent rewrite of the Chinese text, not a translation; where the two differ, the Chinese governs. This paper reads what this series means by marriage. This series reads only the marriage of two people, and does not claim that other forms are not marriage; what it reads is marriage that carries the 15DD direction, that is, marriage in which both people are headed in the direction of recognizing the other as an end too. This direction is a premise, not a component of marriage. It is a direction, not a state: people are all mixed, and falling back is read as it occurs. "Both" is scope, not a requirement between husband and wife: each party can confirm only his own end. Under this premise, marriage is made up of three things: love; each person's own commitment; institutional endorsement. The three do different work, cannot stand in for one another, and are read differently. The love between the two is something the marriage this series reads cannot do without: if it is entirely gone, that marriage exits this series' scope; it is also where exclusivity comes from. Love is seen from the subject's side. Commitment is what each person promised, in word and deed, and where he stands; it binds by where one stands and by the effects already left; from outside, words and deeds and the structure they leave are looked at, and minds are not read. Marriage is not one promise; it is the same promise made anew each day: whoever stands there on any given day is the person of today; this is not read as a commitment lapsing every day and being made over every day. Endorsement is the two people's making this marriage public to an institution, recognizing that institution's power, and obtaining recognition-based rights in return; where its rules are met, it counts; the rules are acknowledged but not judged, and this side is only registered. Registration and vows can be in the same ceremony, and are entered apart. Endorsement cannot stand in for commitment, nor for love; to use endorsement to avow on the other's behalf slides in the direction of colonization. Endorsement gives commitment and exit alike a public side; commitment and endorsement together is the place that holds only in marriage. The exclusivity of marriage comes from love, not from agreement, and is not obtained by exchange: the exclusivity of both is two one-way exclusivities meeting; exclusivity applies to love, not to recognition. Three kinds of marriage are not in this series: a purely transactional marriage; a marriage kept up without love between the two; a marriage whose exit has been sealed off, however it was sealed. Each of the three is read differently; where either of the latter two arises after marriage, that marriage exits scope from then on; this is not traced back, and this series does not turn and judge the two people. This paper interfaces with Kant, Hegel, Locke and Kierkegaard, and, at the layer of marriage, picks up Gilbert's joint commitment. This paper does not prove that a marriage with endorsement is truer than love without endorsement, does not prove that marriage is the completion of love, and does not prove that people ought to marry. SAE 婚姻论 Paper 1。本记录收中文正文与英文版;英文版是独立重写,不是翻译,两版不一致处以中文为准。 这一篇读这个系列所说的婚姻是什么。这个系列只读两个人的婚姻,不主张别的形式不是婚姻;读的是带 15DD 方向的婚姻,即两个人都在认对方也是目的的那个方向上。这个方向是前提,不是婚姻的一个组分。它是方向,不是状态:人都是混合的,回落照读。两方是射程,不是夫妻之间的一项要求:每一方只确认得了自己这一端。 在这个前提下,婚姻由三件合成:有爱;两人各自的承诺;制度背书。三件的作用不同,不能互相替代,读法也不同。两人之间的爱,是这个系列读的婚姻里少不了的一件:完全没有了,那段婚姻就出了射程;它也是排他的来处。爱从主体这一侧看。承诺是各人答应的言行与站,约束靠站与已经留下的作用;从外面看言行与它留下的结构,不读心。婚姻不是一次承诺,是每天重新做出的同一个承诺:每一天站在那里的,都是今天的人;这不读作承诺每天失效、每天重订。背书是两个人把这段婚姻向制度公开,承认那个制度的权力,换取承认性权利;符合它的规则就算,规则认而不判,这一面只登记。登记与誓言可以在同一场里,分开记。背书替不了承诺,也替不了爱;拿背书替对方认领,滑向殖民的方向。背书让承诺与退出都有了公开的一面;承诺与背书同在,是只在婚姻里成立的那一处。 婚姻的排他来自爱,不来自约定,也不是交换来的:两方的排他是两个单向的排他碰上了;排的是爱的那一份,认不排他。三种婚姻不在这个系列里:纯交易的婚姻;没有了两人之间的爱还维持的婚姻;退出被封死的婚姻,无论怎样封的。三种的读法各不相同;后两种发生在婚后的,那段婚姻自那时起出射程,不追溯,也不倒判两个人。这一篇与康德、黑格尔、洛克、克尔凯郭尔对接,并在婚姻这一层接吉尔伯特的共同承诺。这一篇不证明有背书的婚姻比没有背书的爱更真,不证明婚姻是爱情的完成,也不证明人应当结婚。