Sedentary behaviour in rheumatoid arthritis–barriers and facilitators, a qualitative analysis

Abstract Objectives Sedentary behaviour (SB) is a modifiable risk factor in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SB interventions may be more acceptable where pain, fatigue and fluctuating disease activity limit physical activity (PA). To inform the development of effective/scalable interventions, this study aimed to; (1) determine how people with RA conceptualise SB and (2) explore lived experiences of SB to identify barriers and facilitators. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults with RA, recruited in the UK using opportunistic and snowball sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Participants (n = 14) used SB, activity, movement and PA/exercise interchangeably. Three themes were generated. Motivation explained engagement or breaks in SB; SB was reduced when movement was meaningful, enjoyable, or linked to valued roles. Anticipated effort and fear of pain reinforced SB. Resilience and adaptive strategies reduced SB, while competing demands reinforced SB. Movement, captured negotiation between activity and rest, shaped by physical symptoms, contextual factors, and sociocultural influences. The same factors (e.g., family) operated as a facilitator and barrier. Participants recognised that rest prevented exacerbations, however, prolonged sedentariness worsened stiffness and function. Identity in Flux, reflected changes in perceived capability, stigma and loss of identity reinforcing SB for some, while others reconstructed identity to maintain valued roles and social participation. Conclusion SB is shaped by psychological, social and contextual determinants, not symptoms alone. Interventions should adopt identity-sensitive, flexible approaches that enhance meaningful motivations and address pain-related fears, rather than relying on prescriptive targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkag137
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sedentary behaviour in rheumatoid arthritis–barriers and facilitators, a qualitative analysis

Carolyn Anne Greig, Jet Veldhuijzen Zanten, Florentia Kitas, Matthew Willett et al.
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Physical Activity and Health
article

Sedentary behaviour in rheumatoid arthritis–barriers and facilitators, a qualitative analysis

Carolyn Anne Greig, Jet Veldhuijzen Zanten, Florentia Kitas, Matthew Willett, Sally A. M. Fenton
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Sedentary behaviour (SB) is a modifiable risk factor in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SB interventions may be more acceptable where pain, fatigue and fluctuating disease activity limit physical activity (PA). To inform the development of effective/scalable interventions, this study aimed to; (1) determine how people with RA conceptualise SB and (2) explore lived experiences of SB to identify barriers and facilitators. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults with RA, recruited in the UK using opportunistic and snowball sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Participants (n = 14) used SB, activity, movement and PA/exercise interchangeably. Three themes were generated. Motivation explained engagement or breaks in SB; SB was reduced when movement was meaningful, enjoyable, or linked to valued roles. Anticipated effort and fear of pain reinforced SB. Resilience and adaptive strategies reduced SB, while competing demands reinforced SB. Movement, captured negotiation between activity and rest, shaped by physical symptoms, contextual factors, and sociocultural influences. The same factors (e.g., family) operated as a facilitator and barrier. Participants recognised that rest prevented exacerbations, however, prolonged sedentariness worsened stiffness and function. Identity in Flux, reflected changes in perceived capability, stigma and loss of identity reinforcing SB for some, while others reconstructed identity to maintain valued roles and social participation. Conclusion SB is shaped by psychological, social and contextual determinants, not symptoms alone. Interventions should adopt identity-sensitive, flexible approaches that enhance meaningful motivations and address pain-related fears, rather than relying on prescriptive targets.

Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Centre for Movement Disorders (CA), NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon