Resources for creative development: introducing the QELC-Creativity

Supporting creative development requires attention to the resources students can draw on. The QELC-Creativity adapts the Questionnaire of Educational and Learning Capital (QELC) to assess resources relevant to creative development. It brings students’ perceptions of resources within the person and in the environment into a common framework. We examined the 40-item instrument in nonprobability samples from Ukraine, Greece, China, Sudan, and Pakistan, with 6,967 students retained after screening. An extended two-factor model of educational and learning capital was developed from capital-scale scores in one Ukrainian subsample and tested unchanged in the other. The factor loadings could be held equal across countries with little change in fit. This supported approximate metric invariance. Model fit itself was more uneven: some indices were favorable, others less so. Full scalar invariance was not supported. The exploratory partial scalar model met our fit-change criteria. These findings extend the application of educational and learning capital to a further developmental domain and provide an initial international basis for resource-focused creativity research. The instrument gives researchers a shared way to investigate how students’ personal resources and educational opportunities relate to creative engagement. It also brings into view conditions that educational efforts to foster creativity can seek to improve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1980824
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resources for creative development: introducing the QELC-Creativity

Mehmet Bıçakçı, Yu. V. Lysanets, Aikaterini Gari, Albert Ziegler et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Education
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

Resources for creative development: introducing the QELC-Creativity

Mehmet Bıçakçı, Yu. V. Lysanets, Aikaterini Gari, Albert Ziegler, Pin Li, Abdul Sattar, Salaheldin Farah Attallah Bakhiet
article en

Abstract

Supporting creative development requires attention to the resources students can draw on. The QELC-Creativity adapts the Questionnaire of Educational and Learning Capital (QELC) to assess resources relevant to creative development. It brings students’ perceptions of resources within the person and in the environment into a common framework. We examined the 40-item instrument in nonprobability samples from Ukraine, Greece, China, Sudan, and Pakistan, with 6,967 students retained after screening. An extended two-factor model of educational and learning capital was developed from capital-scale scores in one Ukrainian subsample and tested unchanged in the other. The factor loadings could be held equal across countries with little change in fit. This supported approximate metric invariance. Model fit itself was more uneven: some indices were favorable, others less so. Full scalar invariance was not supported. The exploratory partial scalar model met our fit-change criteria. These findings extend the application of educational and learning capital to a further developmental domain and provide an initial international basis for resource-focused creativity research. The instrument gives researchers a shared way to investigate how students’ personal resources and educational opportunities relate to creative engagement. It also brings into view conditions that educational efforts to foster creativity can seek to improve.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Chengdu Normal University (CN), Poltava State Medical University (UA), Arabian Gulf University (BH)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon