Reliability and validity tests and application of the strategic flexibility scale among rural medical alliance personnel in China

As rural medical alliances enter a phase of in-depth implementation, frequent policy changes are exacerbating uncertainty. Strategic flexibility has become key to operational effectiveness. However, the applicability of existing strategic flexibility scale in this context remains to be verified. This study aims to evaluate their validity and reliability, thereby providing a reliable tool for future research. This study introduced the strategic flexibility scale into the context of rural medical alliance for the first time, and verified its validity and reliability across organizational types. From October to November 2023, 430 medical staff from 6 rural medical alliances in Zhejiang Province were selected as the participants. The strategic flexibility scale was used for measurement. Cronbach’s α coefficient, split-half reliability, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and convergent validity were assessed, and multiple linear regression was used for statistical analysis. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for the scale was 0.91, with split-half reliabilities of 0.90 and 0.76 respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit [RMSEA = 0.071, CFI = 0.994, GFI = 0.998, AGFI = 0.956, IFI = 0.994]. The total score for strategic flexibility within rural medical alliances in Zhejiang Province was (20.73 ± 3.24) points. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that holding an intermediate professional title had a stable negative effect ( P < 0.05). After controlling for the fixed effects of rural medical alliances, the organizational-level variables significantly improved model fit ( p < 0.01). The strategic flexibility scale demonstrates good reliability and validity, and can adequately assess the strategic flexibility of rural medical alliances. The scale is simple and easy to administer and may serve as a measurement tool for rural medical alliances in Zhejiang Province; further validation in other regions is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15886-0
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and validity tests and application of the strategic flexibility scale among rural medical alliance personnel in China

林小灵, Qi Chen, Chi Zhou, Xu Li et al.
1 links
BMC Health Services Research
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Reliability and validity tests and application of the strategic flexibility scale among rural medical alliance personnel in China

林小灵, Qi Chen, Chi Zhou, Xu Li, Ping Huang, Yunmeng Li, Qunfang Huang, Yu Chen, Linjia Gao, Yuxuan Jia
article en

Abstract

As rural medical alliances enter a phase of in-depth implementation, frequent policy changes are exacerbating uncertainty. Strategic flexibility has become key to operational effectiveness. However, the applicability of existing strategic flexibility scale in this context remains to be verified. This study aims to evaluate their validity and reliability, thereby providing a reliable tool for future research. This study introduced the strategic flexibility scale into the context of rural medical alliance for the first time, and verified its validity and reliability across organizational types. From October to November 2023, 430 medical staff from 6 rural medical alliances in Zhejiang Province were selected as the participants. The strategic flexibility scale was used for measurement. Cronbach’s α coefficient, split-half reliability, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and convergent validity were assessed, and multiple linear regression was used for statistical analysis. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for the scale was 0.91, with split-half reliabilities of 0.90 and 0.76 respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit [RMSEA = 0.071, CFI = 0.994, GFI = 0.998, AGFI = 0.956, IFI = 0.994]. The total score for strategic flexibility within rural medical alliances in Zhejiang Province was (20.73 ± 3.24) points. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that holding an intermediate professional title had a stable negative effect ( P < 0.05). After controlling for the fixed effects of rural medical alliances, the organizational-level variables significantly improved model fit ( p < 0.01). The strategic flexibility scale demonstrates good reliability and validity, and can adequately assess the strategic flexibility of rural medical alliances. The scale is simple and easy to administer and may serve as a measurement tool for rural medical alliances in Zhejiang Province; further validation in other regions is needed.

BMC Health Services Research
Hangzhou Normal University (CN), Chengdu Medical College (CN), University of Glasgow (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon