Ten simple rules for teaching practical AI to health data teams

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly entered the healthcare discourse, often framed through the lens of frontier models, generative systems, and transformative potential. Yet for many healthcare data teams, the practical path from curiosity to capability remains unclear. Concerns about data privacy, regulatory compliance, brittle systems, and misaligned expectations frequently stall progress before meaningful experimentation can begin. This paper presents ten simple rules for teaching practical AI to healthcare data teams, grounded in real-world data, privacy-first experimentation, and system-level thinking. Drawing on hands-on training experiences and existing educational and methodological literature, we argue that AI education in healthcare must prioritize workflows over models, systems over components, and institutional capability over isolated technical success. These rules are intended to help educators and organizational leaders move teams beyond the AI hype cycle toward building trustworthy, sustainable, and context-aware AI systems that matter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014915
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten simple rules for teaching practical AI to health data teams

Aik Choon Tan, Eric Just
1 links
PLoS Computational Biology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Ten simple rules for teaching practical AI to health data teams

Aik Choon Tan, Eric Just
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly entered the healthcare discourse, often framed through the lens of frontier models, generative systems, and transformative potential. Yet for many healthcare data teams, the practical path from curiosity to capability remains unclear. Concerns about data privacy, regulatory compliance, brittle systems, and misaligned expectations frequently stall progress before meaningful experimentation can begin. This paper presents ten simple rules for teaching practical AI to healthcare data teams, grounded in real-world data, privacy-first experimentation, and system-level thinking. Drawing on hands-on training experiences and existing educational and methodological literature, we argue that AI education in healthcare must prioritize workflows over models, systems over components, and institutional capability over isolated technical success. These rules are intended to help educators and organizational leaders move teams beyond the AI hype cycle toward building trustworthy, sustainable, and context-aware AI systems that matter.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 22(10)
University of Utah (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Quality education, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon