Functionality of Upcycled Carrot Pomace as a Nutritional and Sustainable Additive in the Development of Beef Patties

Upcycling fruit- and vegetable-processing byproducts can reduce food waste while creating functional ingredients. This study compared wet carrot pomace (WCP) with freeze-dried carrot pomace (FDCP) in beef patties formulated at two lean/fat ratios. Five treatments were prepared: an 80% lean/20% fat control (80/20 C); a 90% lean/10% fat control (90/10 C); an 80% lean/20% fat patty with 3.00% w/w FDCP (FDCP); an 80% lean/20% fat patty with 16.09% w/w WCP (regular-fat wet carrot pomace, RFWCP); and a 90% lean/10% fat patty with 16.09% w/w WCP (low-fat wet carrot pomace, LFWCP). The WCP level was selected to deliver the same carrot pomace dry matter as 3.00% w/w FDCP. Patties were analyzed for proximate composition, surface color, texture profile analysis (TPA), sensory analysis, and cook yield after cooking to an internal temperature of 73 °C (165 °F), with increased moisture content in both raw and cooked patties relative to the corresponding fat-level control, whereas FDCP produced moisture values comparable to 80/20 C. During sensory analysis, beef consumers evaluated the five formulations in two sessions two weeks apart: the patty alone (n = 122) and in a bun (n = 100). Attitudinal and measured liking clustering was used to further separate participants’ scores. Cook yield was higher for the WCP treatments (73.2–77.3%) than for the 100% beef controls (68.9–71.2%), while FDCP yields were not significantly different (p > 0.05) from the controls. Fat content followed the intended lean/fat ratio of either 90/10 or 80/20 and was not retained more effectively by either pomace form. WCP produced the largest total color difference (ΔE ≈ 11), driven by lower L* and b* values, while FDCP produced a smaller difference (ΔE ≈ 5.9). TPA showed that pomace patties were softer and less cohesive, with FDCP giving the greatest reductions in hardness and gumminess, indicating a crumblier matrix. In the consumer study, the 80/20 C was most liked and LFWCP least liked, and penalty analysis identified insufficient beef flavor as the primary driver of decreased liking for the pomace-containing patties in both formats, with the largest total penalty for LFWCP (1.10). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) for serving formats; the patty with a bun increased perceived firmness, texture and sweetness for the 80/20 C while decreasing beef flavor, juiciness and aftertaste for RFWCP. Attitudinal clustering did not predict which formulation a participant preferred, whereas clustering on measured liking identified a consumer group that preferred the pomace formulations over both controls. WCP offers a viable means of diverting carrot-processing waste streams and promoting functional upcycling in food product development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gastronomy
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/gastronomy4040024
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functionality of Upcycled Carrot Pomace as a Nutritional and Sustainable Additive in the Development of Beef Patties

Samir Amin, Ruta Lesniauskas, Amy Lammert, Jeff Garza et al.
3 links
Gastronomy
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Functionality of Upcycled Carrot Pomace as a Nutritional and Sustainable Additive in the Development of Beef Patties

Samir Amin, Ruta Lesniauskas, Amy Lammert, Jeff Garza, Karissa Chu, Daniel DeGeorge, Griffin Prough
article en

Abstract

Upcycling fruit- and vegetable-processing byproducts can reduce food waste while creating functional ingredients. This study compared wet carrot pomace (WCP) with freeze-dried carrot pomace (FDCP) in beef patties formulated at two lean/fat ratios. Five treatments were prepared: an 80% lean/20% fat control (80/20 C); a 90% lean/10% fat control (90/10 C); an 80% lean/20% fat patty with 3.00% w/w FDCP (FDCP); an 80% lean/20% fat patty with 16.09% w/w WCP (regular-fat wet carrot pomace, RFWCP); and a 90% lean/10% fat patty with 16.09% w/w WCP (low-fat wet carrot pomace, LFWCP). The WCP level was selected to deliver the same carrot pomace dry matter as 3.00% w/w FDCP. Patties were analyzed for proximate composition, surface color, texture profile analysis (TPA), sensory analysis, and cook yield after cooking to an internal temperature of 73 °C (165 °F), with increased moisture content in both raw and cooked patties relative to the corresponding fat-level control, whereas FDCP produced moisture values comparable to 80/20 C. During sensory analysis, beef consumers evaluated the five formulations in two sessions two weeks apart: the patty alone (n = 122) and in a bun (n = 100). Attitudinal and measured liking clustering was used to further separate participants’ scores. Cook yield was higher for the WCP treatments (73.2–77.3%) than for the 100% beef controls (68.9–71.2%), while FDCP yields were not significantly different (p > 0.05) from the controls. Fat content followed the intended lean/fat ratio of either 90/10 or 80/20 and was not retained more effectively by either pomace form. WCP produced the largest total color difference (ΔE ≈ 11), driven by lower L* and b* values, while FDCP produced a smaller difference (ΔE ≈ 5.9). TPA showed that pomace patties were softer and less cohesive, with FDCP giving the greatest reductions in hardness and gumminess, indicating a crumblier matrix. In the consumer study, the 80/20 C was most liked and LFWCP least liked, and penalty analysis identified insufficient beef flavor as the primary driver of decreased liking for the pomace-containing patties in both formats, with the largest total penalty for LFWCP (1.10). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) for serving formats; the patty with a bun increased perceived firmness, texture and sweetness for the 80/20 C while decreasing beef flavor, juiciness and aftertaste for RFWCP. Attitudinal clustering did not predict which formulation a participant preferred, whereas clustering on measured liking identified a consumer group that preferred the pomace formulations over both controls. WCP offers a viable means of diverting carrot-processing waste streams and promoting functional upcycling in food product development.

GastronomyVol. 4(4)
California Polytechnic State University (US)
Agricultural Research Institute, California State University
Responsible consumption and production, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon