Barriers to Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Implementation in Ghana: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Study

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) contact investigation identifies and manages individuals exposed to TB and supports early detection. However, implementation in high-burden settings faces challenges, and evidence on patient-level concerns and organizational barriers to TB contact investigation in Ghana is scarce. This study examined patient contact disclosure and patient-reported concerns, and explored provider-reported organizational and contextual barriers to implementation in selected healthcare facilities in Ghana's Ashanti Region Methods We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study across six healthcare facilities in three districts. Among 212 adults with pulmonary TB, quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire, and 25 healthcare providers participated in in-depth interviews. Patients were recruited consecutively and providers were purposively selected. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression analyses. Qualitative data underwent deductive-inductive thematic analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as an analytic lens, and quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated during interpretation. Results Among the 212 participants, 82.5% had heard of TB contact investigation, 55.7% reported at least one contact, and 44.3% reported none. Among those reporting contacts, 71 reported fewer than four contacts and 47 reported four or more. Knowledge level was not significantly associated with contact disclosure (χ² = 2.717, p = 0.257). In the adjusted analysis, participants aged 25–34 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.64, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.06–6.54; p = 0.036) and 45–54 years (AOR = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.42–7.13; p = 0.005) had higher odds of reporting contact disclosure than those aged ≥ 55 years. Frequently reported interpersonal concerns included family privacy (46.2%), fear of blame (43.9%), fear of judgment (40.1%), and concern that contacts might experience stigma if screened (38.2%). Providers reported workload, competing responsibilities, limited counselling time, transport constraints, staffing limitations, and coordination challenges. Conclusions TB contact investigation in setting occurred in multilevel context involving patient-reported concerns and provider-reported organizational and logistical constraints. Strengthening implementation may require patient-centered counselling addressing confidentiality, stigma and blame, alongside adequate time, staffing, transport and coordination support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11025733/v1
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Barriers to Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Implementation in Ghana: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Study

Irene Akwo Kretchy, Michael Mireku Opoku, Acheampong Kudom
4 links
Research Square
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
preprint

Barriers to Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Implementation in Ghana: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Study

Irene Akwo Kretchy, Michael Mireku Opoku, Acheampong Kudom
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) contact investigation identifies and manages individuals exposed to TB and supports early detection. However, implementation in high-burden settings faces challenges, and evidence on patient-level concerns and organizational barriers to TB contact investigation in Ghana is scarce. This study examined patient contact disclosure and patient-reported concerns, and explored provider-reported organizational and contextual barriers to implementation in selected healthcare facilities in Ghana's Ashanti Region Methods We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study across six healthcare facilities in three districts. Among 212 adults with pulmonary TB, quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire, and 25 healthcare providers participated in in-depth interviews. Patients were recruited consecutively and providers were purposively selected. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression analyses. Qualitative data underwent deductive-inductive thematic analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as an analytic lens, and quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated during interpretation. Results Among the 212 participants, 82.5% had heard of TB contact investigation, 55.7% reported at least one contact, and 44.3% reported none. Among those reporting contacts, 71 reported fewer than four contacts and 47 reported four or more. Knowledge level was not significantly associated with contact disclosure (χ² = 2.717, p = 0.257). In the adjusted analysis, participants aged 25–34 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.64, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.06–6.54; p = 0.036) and 45–54 years (AOR = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.42–7.13; p = 0.005) had higher odds of reporting contact disclosure than those aged ≥ 55 years. Frequently reported interpersonal concerns included family privacy (46.2%), fear of blame (43.9%), fear of judgment (40.1%), and concern that contacts might experience stigma if screened (38.2%). Providers reported workload, competing responsibilities, limited counselling time, transport constraints, staffing limitations, and coordination challenges. Conclusions TB contact investigation in setting occurred in multilevel context involving patient-reported concerns and provider-reported organizational and logistical constraints. Strengthening implementation may require patient-centered counselling addressing confidentiality, stigma and blame, alongside adequate time, staffing, transport and coordination support.

Research Square
University of Ghana (GH), Catholic University College of Ghana (GH)
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon