AI literacy facets in creative higher education: associations with learning performance and academic well-being

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping how students learn, create, and evaluate knowledge in creative higher education, particularly in design-related programmes where students use AI for ideation, prototyping, visual exploration, content generation, and critique. Rather than treating AI literacy as a single global competence, this study conceptualises it as a multidimensional construct comprising AI knowledge, awareness of affordances and limitations, critical reflection, operational ability, ethical awareness, and emotional adaptability. This study examines how these facets relate to learning performance and academic well-being among students in design and related programmes. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 475 students enrolled in design and related programmes across Europe, Asia, and Australia. Data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Three main patterns emerged. First, AI knowledge was positioned as an upstream resource in the theoretically specified model and showed strong positive structural associations with awareness, critical reflection, operational ability, and ethical awareness. Second, learning performance was associated with a “recognise–reflect–produce” pathway, in which awareness and critical reflection helped connect AI knowledge and operational skills with stronger perceived learning outcomes. Third, ethical awareness was more clearly associated with academic well-being than with learning performance, suggesting that ethical clarity around authorship, fairness, bias, and acceptable AI use may support students’ sense of clarity, fairness, and control in AI-supported creative learning. The findings support a knowledge-first, self-regulated, reflective, and ethically transparent approach to AI literacy in design-related creative higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1959457
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI literacy facets in creative higher education: associations with learning performance and academic well-being

Xiaolin Zhang, Yuanxiong Liu, 楚然 王, Zuji Liang
3 links
Frontiers in Education
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

AI literacy facets in creative higher education: associations with learning performance and academic well-being

Xiaolin Zhang, Yuanxiong Liu, 楚然 王, Zuji Liang
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping how students learn, create, and evaluate knowledge in creative higher education, particularly in design-related programmes where students use AI for ideation, prototyping, visual exploration, content generation, and critique. Rather than treating AI literacy as a single global competence, this study conceptualises it as a multidimensional construct comprising AI knowledge, awareness of affordances and limitations, critical reflection, operational ability, ethical awareness, and emotional adaptability. This study examines how these facets relate to learning performance and academic well-being among students in design and related programmes. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 475 students enrolled in design and related programmes across Europe, Asia, and Australia. Data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Three main patterns emerged. First, AI knowledge was positioned as an upstream resource in the theoretically specified model and showed strong positive structural associations with awareness, critical reflection, operational ability, and ethical awareness. Second, learning performance was associated with a “recognise–reflect–produce” pathway, in which awareness and critical reflection helped connect AI knowledge and operational skills with stronger perceived learning outcomes. Third, ethical awareness was more clearly associated with academic well-being than with learning performance, suggesting that ethical clarity around authorship, fairness, bias, and acceptable AI use may support students’ sense of clarity, fairness, and control in AI-supported creative learning. The findings support a knowledge-first, self-regulated, reflective, and ethically transparent approach to AI literacy in design-related creative higher education.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
Kookmin University (KR), Harbin Normal University (CN), Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon