The FIT Framework for Mitigating Participant Fraud in Online Surveys: A Synthesis of Two International LGBTQ+ Social Research Case Studies

Participant fraud poses a growing threat to international LGBTQ+ social research, yet existing mitigations recommendations are fragmented and inconsistent across the literature. This paper addresses this gap by synthesizing insights across two case studies of international surveys on LGBTQ+ populations compromised by fraud. Case study 1 (N = 1,707) details a preventative screening process in a survey about LGBTQ+ leisure spaces, combining Qualtrics security tools with geolocation and email checks. Case study 2 (N = 3,681) outlines an eliminative strategy in an LGBTQ+ video gaming survey using 10 fraud indicators analyzed using unsupervised machine learning. Each study found fraud rates of 43-45% (n = 2,540) and fraud check utility varied across studies. Practical context-dependent recommendations and future research directions are synthesized into the feasibility, inclusion, trustworthiness (FIT) framework, emphasizing methodological and ethical trade-offs between competing research demands and the need for dynamic and tailored mitigation strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/za8v6_v3
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The FIT Framework for Mitigating Participant Fraud in Online Surveys: A Synthesis of Two International LGBTQ+ Social Research Case Studies

Ashley S. Brooks, Tin D. Vo, Shelley L. Craig
3 links
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
preprint

The FIT Framework for Mitigating Participant Fraud in Online Surveys: A Synthesis of Two International LGBTQ+ Social Research Case Studies

Ashley S. Brooks, Tin D. Vo, Shelley L. Craig
preprint en

Abstract

Participant fraud poses a growing threat to international LGBTQ+ social research, yet existing mitigations recommendations are fragmented and inconsistent across the literature. This paper addresses this gap by synthesizing insights across two case studies of international surveys on LGBTQ+ populations compromised by fraud. Case study 1 (N = 1,707) details a preventative screening process in a survey about LGBTQ+ leisure spaces, combining Qualtrics security tools with geolocation and email checks. Case study 2 (N = 3,681) outlines an eliminative strategy in an LGBTQ+ video gaming survey using 10 fraud indicators analyzed using unsupervised machine learning. Each study found fraud rates of 43-45% (n = 2,540) and fraud check utility varied across studies. Practical context-dependent recommendations and future research directions are synthesized into the feasibility, inclusion, trustworthiness (FIT) framework, emphasizing methodological and ethical trade-offs between competing research demands and the need for dynamic and tailored mitigation strategies.

Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Gender equality, Reduced inequalities
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon