Living evidence map of the global climate and health literature

OBJECTIVES: This is a protocol for a Cochrane review (flexible). The objectives are as follows: The objectives of this living evidence map are to: systematically map the breadth, scope, and characteristics of the global literature on the relationship of climate change, climate variability, weather, climate-forcing agents, and fossil fuels with human health and well-being; enable ongoing, up-to-date access to the evolving evidence base through a living approach (encompassing content currency and adjustment of methods); enable identification of clusters of well-researched areas and evidence gaps; enable flexible, accelerated identification, visualization, selection, analysis, and export of records according to the needs of a diverse group of interest holders via an interactive interface and filtering via a dedicated taxonomy; enable the continuous monitoring of a specific topic of interest; and evaluate the rigor, legitimacy, and utility of an AI-supported living evidence mapping approach. Specifically, we envision the map to enable: researchers to identify, collate, and select existing evidence and diverse study designs, explore clusters and gaps, and produce evidence syntheses in a more efficient way; policymakers and international and intergovernmental organizations (such as the World Health Organization or the Sustainable Development Goals Synthesis Coalition) to understand the scope, scale, and distribution of the evidence; research funding bodies to take a more evidence-based approach to funding decisions and identify and fund priority topics, where evidence is most needed and duplication of efforts is avoided; science assessment bodies such as the IPCC or the Lancet Countdown on Climate Change and Health to obtain a comprehensive overview of the research landscape and obtain easy access to relevant lines of evidence for their assessment; health professionals and health systems decision-makers to monitor emerging evidence and evidence syntheses in specific areas that can inform clinical and public health practice and guidelines; and patients and communities directly affected by climate change to gain an overview of the literature relevant to the health risks they face and support the development of evidence-based preparedness and resilience strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd016408
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Living evidence map of the global climate and health literature

James Thomas, Promise M. Nduku, Ishita Gopal, Mbah P Okwen et al.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Living evidence map of the global climate and health literature

James Thomas, Promise M. Nduku, Ishita Gopal, Mbah P Okwen, Anna H Noel-Storr, Tim Repke, Pauline Scheelbeek, Nadia Soliman, Max Callaghan, Britta Tendal Jeppesen, Lena Schmidt, Maria-Intí Metzendorf, Kaitlyn Hair, Pastan Lusiba, Jan Minx, Ismael Kawooya, Andres Mena Mora, Ailbhe Finnerty Mutlu, Alang Ernest Wung, supported by the Cochrane Planetary Health Thematic Group, Ignacio Pita Vaca, Maria Pontes
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This is a protocol for a Cochrane review (flexible). The objectives are as follows: The objectives of this living evidence map are to: systematically map the breadth, scope, and characteristics of the global literature on the relationship of climate change, climate variability, weather, climate-forcing agents, and fossil fuels with human health and well-being; enable ongoing, up-to-date access to the evolving evidence base through a living approach (encompassing content currency and adjustment of methods); enable identification of clusters of well-researched areas and evidence gaps; enable flexible, accelerated identification, visualization, selection, analysis, and export of records according to the needs of a diverse group of interest holders via an interactive interface and filtering via a dedicated taxonomy; enable the continuous monitoring of a specific topic of interest; and evaluate the rigor, legitimacy, and utility of an AI-supported living evidence mapping approach. Specifically, we envision the map to enable: researchers to identify, collate, and select existing evidence and diverse study designs, explore clusters and gaps, and produce evidence syntheses in a more efficient way; policymakers and international and intergovernmental organizations (such as the World Health Organization or the Sustainable Development Goals Synthesis Coalition) to understand the scope, scale, and distribution of the evidence; research funding bodies to take a more evidence-based approach to funding decisions and identify and fund priority topics, where evidence is most needed and duplication of efforts is avoided; science assessment bodies such as the IPCC or the Lancet Countdown on Climate Change and Health to obtain a comprehensive overview of the research landscape and obtain easy access to relevant lines of evidence for their assessment; health professionals and health systems decision-makers to monitor emerging evidence and evidence syntheses in specific areas that can inform clinical and public health practice and guidelines; and patients and communities directly affected by climate change to gain an overview of the literature relevant to the health risks they face and support the development of evidence-based preparedness and resilience strategies.

Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsVol. 2026(10)
University of Cape Town (ZA), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Futurefish Foundation (AU), Effective Basic Services for Africa (CM), Future Evidence Foundation (AU), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University College London (GB), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), Cochrane (GB), Makerere University (UG)
Good health and well-being, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon