Ethical Boundaries in Human-AI Collaborative Decision Systems: A Review

This review covers human–artificial intelligence collaboration in making decisions, observing how scholarship has moved from thinking of AI as a passive tool to considering it as an active actor in healthcare, management, and ethics. While AI systems provide for efficient data processing and pattern recognition, humans provide contextual understanding, ethical judgment, creativity, and accountability. Previous literature suggests that well-designed collaboration between humans and AI may outperform completely automated decision-making. However, several key challenges persist, like bias, lack of transparency, miscalibrated trust, poorly defined distribution of roles, and accountability gaps. To handle these concerns, human-centered design, explainability in AI, well-articulated guidelines on ethical consideration, and mechanisms that effectively introduce oversight remain at the core of literature. These approaches jointly try to ensure that human–AI decision-making systems are fair, accountable, and trustworthy in high-stakes and critical settings

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Review in Applied Science Humanities and Technology
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71143/fgpg6d15
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Boundaries in Human-AI Collaborative Decision Systems: A Review

Kumkum Suryavanshi, Kumkum Shukla, Harsh Prajapat, Khushi Chouhan et al.
3 links
International Journal of Research and Review in Applied Science Humanities and Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Ethical Boundaries in Human-AI Collaborative Decision Systems: A Review

Kumkum Suryavanshi, Kumkum Shukla, Harsh Prajapat, Khushi Chouhan, Praveena Joshi
article en

Abstract

This review covers human–artificial intelligence collaboration in making decisions, observing how scholarship has moved from thinking of AI as a passive tool to considering it as an active actor in healthcare, management, and ethics. While AI systems provide for efficient data processing and pattern recognition, humans provide contextual understanding, ethical judgment, creativity, and accountability. Previous literature suggests that well-designed collaboration between humans and AI may outperform completely automated decision-making. However, several key challenges persist, like bias, lack of transparency, miscalibrated trust, poorly defined distribution of roles, and accountability gaps. To handle these concerns, human-centered design, explainability in AI, well-articulated guidelines on ethical consideration, and mechanisms that effectively introduce oversight remain at the core of literature. These approaches jointly try to ensure that human–AI decision-making systems are fair, accountable, and trustworthy in high-stakes and critical settings

International Journal of Research and Review in Applied Science Humanities and TechnologyVol. 3(4)
Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon