Methodological lineages of concept analysis and mapping of reporting elements in nursing and health-related disciplines: A scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Concept analysis is widely used in nursing and health-related disciplines to clarify ambiguous constructs, refine disciplinary language and support theory development, instrument construction, education and practice. However, concept analysis is methodologically plural rather than a single uniform method. Different approaches vary in their assumptions, data sources, analytic steps and expected outputs. AIMS: This scoping review will identify methodological lineages of concept analysis and map reporting elements across nursing and health-related disciplines. It will examine both the cross-lineage applicability and the empirical distribution of candidate reporting elements. METHODS: The review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews and will be reported according to the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. Ten English- and Chinese-language databases will be searched from inception to the final search date, supplemented by targeted citation searching for foundational methodological sources. Two reviewers will independently screen records after calibration on a purposively enriched set of 25 records containing likely inclusions, likely exclusions and borderline records. Formal screening will begin after both overall raw agreement and positive agreement for the include/uncertain decision reach at least 75%; raw agreement and Cohen's kappa will be reported before consensus. Data will be charted using a piloted form and synthesised descriptively through deductive-inductive framework analysis. Reporting elements will be mapped by both methodological applicability and empirical distribution. CONCLUSION: The review will provide a structured account of concept analysis methods and reporting elements. It represents an evidence-mapping and candidate-item generation stage and will not itself produce a formal reporting guideline. The protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/xru7f.
Authors
- Jiejie Ge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2600-0291)
- Min You
- Sijing Peng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-5029)
- Ting Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1646-0613)
- Peili Xu
- Xiang Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2322-5988)
- Min Wang
Institutions
- Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Hefei First People's Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2026-10-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361727
- Primary Topic
- Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Anhui Provincial Department of Education
- Anhui Provincial Quality Engineering Project
- University Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Province