Hospitals as AI Deployers: Organisational Failures and Direct Liability Risks

Abstract The present study aims to investigate the direct liability risk borne by hospitals (fault-based liability, hinging on the organisational failures of the hospital) when they deploy an AI-based medical device, with particular attention to clinical decision support systems. To do so, the article analyses the choices that hospitals make when deploying new medical devices, their sphere of control and the concrete likelihood of having to pay for damages. The study first reconstructs the lifecycle of deployment of AI systems by hospitals, through five different phases, and identifies the related organisational decisions that may generate foreseeable risks if inadequately performed and thus may lead to direct liability. The analysis then shifts to reconstructing the relevant spheres of control: it is highlighted how hospital and AI provider both contribute to the creation of the clinical environment, within which the physician exercises clinical discretion. The study further examines the concrete exposure of hospitals to direct liability on the basis of structural obstacles that claimants face and the circumstances under which recognising such liability becomes more realistic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2026.10176
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hospitals as AI Deployers: Organisational Failures and Direct Liability Risks

Arianna Giorgetti, Giuseppe Contissa, Claudia Giorgetti
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

Hospitals as AI Deployers: Organisational Failures and Direct Liability Risks

Arianna Giorgetti, Giuseppe Contissa, Claudia Giorgetti
article en

Abstract

Abstract The present study aims to investigate the direct liability risk borne by hospitals (fault-based liability, hinging on the organisational failures of the hospital) when they deploy an AI-based medical device, with particular attention to clinical decision support systems. To do so, the article analyses the choices that hospitals make when deploying new medical devices, their sphere of control and the concrete likelihood of having to pay for damages. The study first reconstructs the lifecycle of deployment of AI systems by hospitals, through five different phases, and identifies the related organisational decisions that may generate foreseeable risks if inadequately performed and thus may lead to direct liability. The analysis then shifts to reconstructing the relevant spheres of control: it is highlighted how hospital and AI provider both contribute to the creation of the clinical environment, within which the physician exercises clinical discretion. The study further examines the concrete exposure of hospitals to direct liability on the basis of structural obstacles that claimants face and the circumstances under which recognising such liability becomes more realistic.

European Journal of Risk Regulation
University of Bologna (IT)
Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Hospitals as AI Deployers: Organisational Failures and Direct Liability Risks — Arianna Giorgetti, Giuseppe Contissa, et al. · European Journal of Risk Regulation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS