How intermittent piped water supplies impact households and coping strategies: A systematic review

Abstract More than a billion people globally use a piped water system that is an intermittent water supply (IWS), where water is often unavailable from the network. Previous reviews have summarized relationships between IWS, water quality, human health risks, and coping costs. Yet, beyond these documented impacts, IWS bears additional—often invisible—burdens on users comprising both financial and non-financial costs and social and health burdens. We conducted a systematic review to document these burdens by searching databases for publications that described human impacts of IWS and coping or adaptive management strategies at the household or individual level. We used a novel codebook of coping strategies and adaptive management to synthesize 140 studies meeting our inclusion criteria conducted in 36 countries between 1994-2023. The most frequently reported impacts were increased household spending, poor water quality, time lost managing water, livelihood disruptions, and hygiene/sanitation interruptions. We also found evidence of links between IWS and respiratory infections, vector-borne diseases, dietary changes, physical strain and injuries, dehydration, sleep disruption, psychosocial stress, and interpersonal violence. The most common coping strategies were related to water storage, purchasing, and acquisition costs. Unpredictable IWS was most commonly linked to a small set of household impacts. This review demonstrates that the impacts of IWS on households are more diverse than previously synthesized and highlights the importance of interdisciplinary work to support sustainable solutions that mitigate adverse household impacts of IWS systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aebbdb
Primary Topic
Water Resource Management and Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How intermittent piped water supplies impact households and coping strategies: A systematic review

Emily Kumpel, Ayşe Ercümen, Amber Wutich, David E. Fuente et al.
Environmental Research Letters
Water Resource Management and Quality
article

How intermittent piped water supplies impact households and coping strategies: A systematic review

Emily Kumpel, Ayşe Ercümen, Amber Wutich, David E. Fuente, Asher Yoel Rosinger, Patrick Thomson, Godfred Amankwaa, Lauren M. T. Broyles, Karina A. Chavarría, Justin B. Stoler, Lucas Seghezzo, Collins, Bubala Mwiinga Chimbanga, Narayana N Billava
article en

Abstract

Abstract More than a billion people globally use a piped water system that is an intermittent water supply (IWS), where water is often unavailable from the network. Previous reviews have summarized relationships between IWS, water quality, human health risks, and coping costs. Yet, beyond these documented impacts, IWS bears additional—often invisible—burdens on users comprising both financial and non-financial costs and social and health burdens. We conducted a systematic review to document these burdens by searching databases for publications that described human impacts of IWS and coping or adaptive management strategies at the household or individual level. We used a novel codebook of coping strategies and adaptive management to synthesize 140 studies meeting our inclusion criteria conducted in 36 countries between 1994-2023. The most frequently reported impacts were increased household spending, poor water quality, time lost managing water, livelihood disruptions, and hygiene/sanitation interruptions. We also found evidence of links between IWS and respiratory infections, vector-borne diseases, dietary changes, physical strain and injuries, dehydration, sleep disruption, psychosocial stress, and interpersonal violence. The most common coping strategies were related to water storage, purchasing, and acquisition costs. Unpredictable IWS was most commonly linked to a small set of household impacts. This review demonstrates that the impacts of IWS on households are more diverse than previously synthesized and highlights the importance of interdisciplinary work to support sustainable solutions that mitigate adverse household impacts of IWS systems.

Environmental Research Letters
National University of Salta (AR), Pennsylvania State University (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of Miami (US), University of South Carolina (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), University of Bristol (GB), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research (IN), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Water Resource Management and Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon