One metaverse, different journeys: gender and the psychological drivers of university students' adoption intentions

Background The educational metaverse presents emerging opportunities for transforming university learning, yet students' willingness to adopt such environments may depend on psychological, technological and contextual factors. This study examined the predictors of university students' behavioural intentions to use the educational metaverse in Ghana, with particular attention to mediating and moderating mechanisms and gender differences. Methods An analytical survey design was employed, and data were collected from 917 university students selected through purposive sampling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to examine the direct, mediating and moderating relationships among the study variables. Results Perceived observability, compatibility, cyber risk, personal innovativeness, trust and perceived usefulness were significantly associated with behavioural intention, whereas perceived complexity was negatively associated with behavioural intention. Perceived ease of use and enjoyment were not directly associated with behavioural intention. Trust significantly mediated the association between perceived usefulness and behavioural intention, while observability mediated the association between personal innovativeness and behavioural intention. However, enjoyment did not significantly mediate the association between perceived ease of use and behavioural intention. Gender significantly moderated the associations of compatibility, personal innovativeness, trust and perceived usefulness with behavioural intention, indicating differences in adoption patterns between male and female students. Cyber risk also moderated the association between trust and behavioural intention, weakening the positive relationship between the two constructs. Conclusions The findings suggest that educational metaverse adoption among university students is shaped by a combination of technological perceptions, personal innovativeness, trust and cyber risk, with several relationships operating through mediating and moderating mechanisms. The study extends educational metaverse adoption research by demonstrating the importance of examining these mechanisms rather than relying solely on direct predictors of behavioural intention. Universities and educational technology developers should therefore consider trust, cybersecurity and gender-related differences when designing and implementing metaverse-based learning environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1934981
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One metaverse, different journeys: gender and the psychological drivers of university students' adoption intentions

Francis Arthur, Monica Ofosu-Koranteng, Valentina Arkorful, Ahmad Samed Al‐Adwan et al.
5 links
Frontiers in Education
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
article

One metaverse, different journeys: gender and the psychological drivers of university students' adoption intentions

Francis Arthur, Monica Ofosu-Koranteng, Valentina Arkorful, Ahmad Samed Al‐Adwan, Sharon Abam Nortey, Mark Inkoom
article en

Abstract

Background The educational metaverse presents emerging opportunities for transforming university learning, yet students' willingness to adopt such environments may depend on psychological, technological and contextual factors. This study examined the predictors of university students' behavioural intentions to use the educational metaverse in Ghana, with particular attention to mediating and moderating mechanisms and gender differences. Methods An analytical survey design was employed, and data were collected from 917 university students selected through purposive sampling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to examine the direct, mediating and moderating relationships among the study variables. Results Perceived observability, compatibility, cyber risk, personal innovativeness, trust and perceived usefulness were significantly associated with behavioural intention, whereas perceived complexity was negatively associated with behavioural intention. Perceived ease of use and enjoyment were not directly associated with behavioural intention. Trust significantly mediated the association between perceived usefulness and behavioural intention, while observability mediated the association between personal innovativeness and behavioural intention. However, enjoyment did not significantly mediate the association between perceived ease of use and behavioural intention. Gender significantly moderated the associations of compatibility, personal innovativeness, trust and perceived usefulness with behavioural intention, indicating differences in adoption patterns between male and female students. Cyber risk also moderated the association between trust and behavioural intention, weakening the positive relationship between the two constructs. Conclusions The findings suggest that educational metaverse adoption among university students is shaped by a combination of technological perceptions, personal innovativeness, trust and cyber risk, with several relationships operating through mediating and moderating mechanisms. The study extends educational metaverse adoption research by demonstrating the importance of examining these mechanisms rather than relying solely on direct predictors of behavioural intention. Universities and educational technology developers should therefore consider trust, cybersecurity and gender-related differences when designing and implementing metaverse-based learning environments.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
Al-Ahliyya Amman University (JO), University of Cape Coast (GH)
Quality education, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon