Introduction to ‘Interaction and All That’

This short article introduces Norbert Elias's hitherto unpublished essay entitled 'Interaction and All That', originally written in the 1960s. We propose that the essay can be understood as part of a considerably larger critique of methodological individualism where Elias takes aim at the 'genetic idea' that social life can be reconstructed from the interactions of already constituted persons — an assumption he traces from Spencer and Weber through to Parsons, Ginsberg and the interactionist traditions. We show how Elias traces two key sources for this tendency in Western thought: firstly, sociology's borrowing of atomistic models from physics, and secondly, the insufficient detachment of sociologists from the individualistic societies whose 'personality-centred vista' they inhabit and, in their own way, help to reproduce. Against this, we suggest, Elias reorients sociological explanation towards the structures of interdependence within which interaction becomes possible: an idea that he later develops more concretely in his discussion of the game models in What is Sociology? We suggest that Elias'ss questions remain pressing amid the naturalisation of the autonomous individual in neoliberal thought of the present day.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Figurations
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29311/hf.v10i1.5503
Primary Topic
Sociology and Norbert Elias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction to ‘Interaction and All That’

Stephen Mennell, Steve Loyal
2 links
Human Figurations
Sociology and Norbert Elias
article

Introduction to ‘Interaction and All That’

Stephen Mennell, Steve Loyal
article en

Abstract

This short article introduces Norbert Elias's hitherto unpublished essay entitled 'Interaction and All That', originally written in the 1960s. We propose that the essay can be understood as part of a considerably larger critique of methodological individualism where Elias takes aim at the 'genetic idea' that social life can be reconstructed from the interactions of already constituted persons — an assumption he traces from Spencer and Weber through to Parsons, Ginsberg and the interactionist traditions. We show how Elias traces two key sources for this tendency in Western thought: firstly, sociology's borrowing of atomistic models from physics, and secondly, the insufficient detachment of sociologists from the individualistic societies whose 'personality-centred vista' they inhabit and, in their own way, help to reproduce. Against this, we suggest, Elias reorients sociological explanation towards the structures of interdependence within which interaction becomes possible: an idea that he later develops more concretely in his discussion of the game models in What is Sociology? We suggest that Elias'ss questions remain pressing amid the naturalisation of the autonomous individual in neoliberal thought of the present day.

Human FigurationsVol. 10(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sociology and Norbert Elias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon