A Retrospective Radiographic Study of Metacarpal and Phalangeal Length Proportions: Testing the Golden Ratio, Fibonacci, and Lucas Models

AimsThis study tested whether the radiographic lengths of the metacarpals and phalanges conform to five previously proposed proportional models based on the Golden Ratio, the Fibonacci sequence, and the Lucas sequence in adult and paediatric hands. MethodsA retrospective observational study was performed of posteroanterior hand radiographs obtained at a district general hospital between January 1 and March 9, 2024.Of 467 radiographic examinations screened, 413 hands from 315 patients met the inclusion criteria: 353 adult hands (patients aged 19-95 years) and 60 paediatric hands (aged 6-18 years).Metacarpal and phalangeal lengths were measured on the picture archiving and communication system to 0.1 mm.Five a priori hypotheses were tested: Golden Ratio relationships between adjacent bones, Lucas sequence proportions (1:1.3:2.3:3.6), a 1:1:2 Fibonacci pattern in the little finger, proportional balance between bone segments, and additive sequence behaviour.Each mean ratio or difference was compared with its predicted value using a two-tailed one-sample z-test and its 95% confidence interval (CI), in the whole sample and six subgroups (336 comparisons).A predicted value lying within the 95% CI was taken as not rejected, not as proof of equivalence. ResultsOf 336 comparisons, 324 differed significantly from the predicted values, and 306 remained significant after adjustment (311 at p < 0.001).No consistent Golden Ratio relationships were identified in adjacent bone segments.Subgroup analysis demonstrated isolated approximations, particularly in the proximal-to-middle phalanx ratio of the middle finger in paediatric and adult male groups.The proposed Lucas sequence pattern was largely absent, with only the paediatric ring finger demonstrating a partial correspondence.The little finger did not demonstrate a consistent Fibonacci relationship.Evidence of proportional balance between phalanges was limited to isolated observations, notably in the adult index finger and paediatric middle finger.Additive sequence relationships were similarly restricted to these subgroups. ConclusionIn this single-centre radiographic sample, metacarpal and phalangeal lengths did not consistently conform to the Golden Ratio, Fibonacci sequence, or Lucas sequence.The few subgroup ratios close to the predicted values were isolated, occurred mostly in the smallest subgroup, and are compatible with chance across multiple comparisons.They should be treated as hypothesis-generating, and confirmation in multicentre and longitudinal samples is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.118834
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Retrospective Radiographic Study of Metacarpal and Phalangeal Length Proportions: Testing the Golden Ratio, Fibonacci, and Lucas Models

George Zafiropoulos, Ka Yan Wong, Sam Singh
Cureus
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

A Retrospective Radiographic Study of Metacarpal and Phalangeal Length Proportions: Testing the Golden Ratio, Fibonacci, and Lucas Models

George Zafiropoulos, Ka Yan Wong, Sam Singh
article en

Abstract

AimsThis study tested whether the radiographic lengths of the metacarpals and phalanges conform to five previously proposed proportional models based on the Golden Ratio, the Fibonacci sequence, and the Lucas sequence in adult and paediatric hands. MethodsA retrospective observational study was performed of posteroanterior hand radiographs obtained at a district general hospital between January 1 and March 9, 2024.Of 467 radiographic examinations screened, 413 hands from 315 patients met the inclusion criteria: 353 adult hands (patients aged 19-95 years) and 60 paediatric hands (aged 6-18 years).Metacarpal and phalangeal lengths were measured on the picture archiving and communication system to 0.1 mm.Five a priori hypotheses were tested: Golden Ratio relationships between adjacent bones, Lucas sequence proportions (1:1.3:2.3:3.6), a 1:1:2 Fibonacci pattern in the little finger, proportional balance between bone segments, and additive sequence behaviour.Each mean ratio or difference was compared with its predicted value using a two-tailed one-sample z-test and its 95% confidence interval (CI), in the whole sample and six subgroups (336 comparisons).A predicted value lying within the 95% CI was taken as not rejected, not as proof of equivalence. ResultsOf 336 comparisons, 324 differed significantly from the predicted values, and 306 remained significant after adjustment (311 at p < 0.001).No consistent Golden Ratio relationships were identified in adjacent bone segments.Subgroup analysis demonstrated isolated approximations, particularly in the proximal-to-middle phalanx ratio of the middle finger in paediatric and adult male groups.The proposed Lucas sequence pattern was largely absent, with only the paediatric ring finger demonstrating a partial correspondence.The little finger did not demonstrate a consistent Fibonacci relationship.Evidence of proportional balance between phalanges was limited to isolated observations, notably in the adult index finger and paediatric middle finger.Additive sequence relationships were similarly restricted to these subgroups. ConclusionIn this single-centre radiographic sample, metacarpal and phalangeal lengths did not consistently conform to the Golden Ratio, Fibonacci sequence, or Lucas sequence.The few subgroup ratios close to the predicted values were isolated, occurred mostly in the smallest subgroup, and are compatible with chance across multiple comparisons.They should be treated as hypothesis-generating, and confirmation in multicentre and longitudinal samples is required.

Cureus
University of South Wales (GB), Raigmore Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon