Perampanel in the treatment of focal epilepsies associated with brain tumors

Epilepsy associated with brain tumors occupies a special place among structural focal epilepsies; it requires a multidisciplinary approach to treatment and close collaboration between a neurologist-epileptologist, a neurosurgeon and an oncologist. Frequent and severe epileptic seizures (including status epilepticus), drug-resistant disease and high mortality rates determine the severity of the condition and the poor quality of life experienced by patients. With the emergence of new and cutting-edge anti-seizure medications (ASMs), it is now a priority to identify the most effective and safest ASMs for the treatment of this patient group. Objective: a retrospective comparative analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel (PER) as an adjunctive therapy for tumor-associated epilepsies, compared with conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Material and methods. The study included data from 156 adult patients (aged 19–83) with primary and secondary brain tumors and tumor-associated epilepsy. The patients were divided into two comparable groups of 78 patients each: the main group received antiepileptic therapy including PER, whilst the comparison group received combinations of other AEDs. The follow-up period ranged from 1 year to 3 years or more. Efficacy was assessed after 12 months of treatment in both groups. Results. In the main group, 59% of patients achieved either a one-year seizure remission or a reduction in their frequency of more than 50%, which was significantly higher than the corresponding figure in the comparison group (41%; p=0.014). The incidence of adverse events in the PER group was half that in the control group (10% versus 20%); these events were dose-dependent and did not require discontinuation of the drug. Conclusion. PER has demonstrated high efficacy and a favourable safety profile in tumor-associated epilepsy, which justifies its use in clinical practice for this patient group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology neuropsychiatry Psychosomatics
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2026-5-66-72
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perampanel in the treatment of focal epilepsies associated with brain tumors

И. А. Жидкова, A. M. Azhigova, Д. Р. Насхлеташвили, G. G. Samsonova et al.
2 links
Neurology neuropsychiatry Psychosomatics
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Perampanel in the treatment of focal epilepsies associated with brain tumors

И. А. Жидкова, A. M. Azhigova, Д. Р. Насхлеташвили, G. G. Samsonova, Pavel Nikolayevich Vlasov, Nikolay V. Zhulin
article en

Abstract

Epilepsy associated with brain tumors occupies a special place among structural focal epilepsies; it requires a multidisciplinary approach to treatment and close collaboration between a neurologist-epileptologist, a neurosurgeon and an oncologist. Frequent and severe epileptic seizures (including status epilepticus), drug-resistant disease and high mortality rates determine the severity of the condition and the poor quality of life experienced by patients. With the emergence of new and cutting-edge anti-seizure medications (ASMs), it is now a priority to identify the most effective and safest ASMs for the treatment of this patient group. Objective: a retrospective comparative analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel (PER) as an adjunctive therapy for tumor-associated epilepsies, compared with conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Material and methods. The study included data from 156 adult patients (aged 19–83) with primary and secondary brain tumors and tumor-associated epilepsy. The patients were divided into two comparable groups of 78 patients each: the main group received antiepileptic therapy including PER, whilst the comparison group received combinations of other AEDs. The follow-up period ranged from 1 year to 3 years or more. Efficacy was assessed after 12 months of treatment in both groups. Results. In the main group, 59% of patients achieved either a one-year seizure remission or a reduction in their frequency of more than 50%, which was significantly higher than the corresponding figure in the comparison group (41%; p=0.014). The incidence of adverse events in the PER group was half that in the control group (10% versus 20%); these events were dose-dependent and did not require discontinuation of the drug. Conclusion. PER has demonstrated high efficacy and a favourable safety profile in tumor-associated epilepsy, which justifies its use in clinical practice for this patient group.

Neurology neuropsychiatry PsychosomaticsVol. 18(5)
Russian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin (RU), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU), City Clinical Hospital (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon