AI Governance: A Comparative Economic Analysis of Japanese and Indonesian AI Regulation

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has prompted global discourse on the need for a robust regulatory framework that addresses ethical, legal, and social issues and fosters the innovation through the efficiencies created by AI. This research conducts a comparative analysis of the AI governance frameworks in Japan and Indonesia, examined through the theoretical lens of Economic Analysis of Law (EAL). Japan has taken a nuanced approach that balances the dynamic development of AI with ethical oversight to uphold the Human-Centered AI Social Principles. Indonesia is in the formative stages of developing its AI regulatory environment. Through EAL, this research assesses the efficiency implications of the AI regulatory frameworks between Japan and Indonesia, looking at the implementation of AI in society. By comparing these approaches, this paper highlights the challenges and opportunities for Indonesia in regulating AI technology for the public interest. Indonesia is advised to take a multi-stakeholder approach to build consensus and engage in bilateral cooperation with Japan for the establishment of domestic legislation. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Efficiency; Legislation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Unram Law Review
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v10i2.544
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Governance: A Comparative Economic Analysis of Japanese and Indonesian AI Regulation

Imam Dwi Cahyo
4 links
Unram Law Review
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

AI Governance: A Comparative Economic Analysis of Japanese and Indonesian AI Regulation

Imam Dwi Cahyo
article en

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has prompted global discourse on the need for a robust regulatory framework that addresses ethical, legal, and social issues and fosters the innovation through the efficiencies created by AI. This research conducts a comparative analysis of the AI governance frameworks in Japan and Indonesia, examined through the theoretical lens of Economic Analysis of Law (EAL). Japan has taken a nuanced approach that balances the dynamic development of AI with ethical oversight to uphold the Human-Centered AI Social Principles. Indonesia is in the formative stages of developing its AI regulatory environment. Through EAL, this research assesses the efficiency implications of the AI regulatory frameworks between Japan and Indonesia, looking at the implementation of AI in society. By comparing these approaches, this paper highlights the challenges and opportunities for Indonesia in regulating AI technology for the public interest. Indonesia is advised to take a multi-stakeholder approach to build consensus and engage in bilateral cooperation with Japan for the establishment of domestic legislation. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Efficiency; Legislation.

Unram Law ReviewVol. 10(2)
Universitas Sugeng Hartono (ID)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon