Wild spine infections: Long-term outcomes and surgical strategies in refractory postoperative spinal infections

Background: Most postoperative spinal infections resolve with timely debridement and culture-directed antimicrobial therapy. A minority, however, progress to persistent infection with osseous destruction, mechanical instability, and repeated surgical failure. Evidence-based strategies for managing this high-risk salvage population remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical, neurological, and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing definitive reconstructive surgery after multiple failed revision procedures for refractory postoperative spinal infection. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent two or more revision surgeries for refractory postoperative spinal infection with associated instability or deformity. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Frankel neurological grade; radiological outcomes focused on sagittal alignment. All patients underwent aggressive debridement followed by posterior, anterior, or combined reconstruction, with adjunctive antimicrobial therapy and hyperbaric oxygen. Given the limited sample size, statistical analyses were considered hypothesis-generating. Results: Thirteen patients (mean age, 47.7 years) with a mean follow-up of 64 months and a mean of 4.9 prior spinal surgeries were included. Mean VAS score decreased from 9.5 preoperatively to 1.7 at 1 year ( p < 0.001), and mean ODI improved from 62.4 to 19.2 ( p < 0.001). Neurological improvement occurred in 53.8% of patients, with complete recovery in 30.8%. Sagittal segmental alignment improved significantly after surgery, but the magnitude of radiological correction did not correlate with pain or functional outcomes. Conclusion: In refractory postoperative spinal infection requiring salvage reconstruction, restoration of mechanical stability, rather than radiological correction, is the principal determinant of clinical and neurological recovery. Early recognition and timely definitive reconstruction may improve long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Neurology International
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_908_2026
Primary Topic
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wild spine infections: Long-term outcomes and surgical strategies in refractory postoperative spinal infections

Levent Aydın, Sedat Dalbayrak, Buse Sarıgül, Mesut Yılmaz et al.
Surgical Neurology International
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
article

Wild spine infections: Long-term outcomes and surgical strategies in refractory postoperative spinal infections

Levent Aydın, Sedat Dalbayrak, Buse Sarıgül, Mesut Yılmaz, Behrad Aras Nasehi
article en

Abstract

Background: Most postoperative spinal infections resolve with timely debridement and culture-directed antimicrobial therapy. A minority, however, progress to persistent infection with osseous destruction, mechanical instability, and repeated surgical failure. Evidence-based strategies for managing this high-risk salvage population remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical, neurological, and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing definitive reconstructive surgery after multiple failed revision procedures for refractory postoperative spinal infection. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent two or more revision surgeries for refractory postoperative spinal infection with associated instability or deformity. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Frankel neurological grade; radiological outcomes focused on sagittal alignment. All patients underwent aggressive debridement followed by posterior, anterior, or combined reconstruction, with adjunctive antimicrobial therapy and hyperbaric oxygen. Given the limited sample size, statistical analyses were considered hypothesis-generating. Results: Thirteen patients (mean age, 47.7 years) with a mean follow-up of 64 months and a mean of 4.9 prior spinal surgeries were included. Mean VAS score decreased from 9.5 preoperatively to 1.7 at 1 year ( p < 0.001), and mean ODI improved from 62.4 to 19.2 ( p < 0.001). Neurological improvement occurred in 53.8% of patients, with complete recovery in 30.8%. Sagittal segmental alignment improved significantly after surgery, but the magnitude of radiological correction did not correlate with pain or functional outcomes. Conclusion: In refractory postoperative spinal infection requiring salvage reconstruction, restoration of mechanical stability, rather than radiological correction, is the principal determinant of clinical and neurological recovery. Early recognition and timely definitive reconstruction may improve long-term outcomes.

Surgical Neurology InternationalVol. 17
Ümraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon