Efficacy and tolerability of liraglutide for refractory bile acid diarrhoea

Background Bile acid sequestrants are used for the treatment of bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) but they are not always effective and may be tolerated poorly. Other treatment options for BAD are limited. Both randomised controlled trial and case series data suggest that liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, may be effective in BAD but studies are scarce. Aims To report efficacy and tolerability of liraglutide in a cohort of patients with refractory BAD who had either not responded to or were intolerant of the bile acid sequestrants colestyramine and colesevelam. Methods Data were collected prospectively for patients with refractory BAD (7-day 23-seleno-25-homo-tauro-cholic acid retention <15%) receiving liraglutide in Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Clinical response to, and tolerability of, liraglutide was assessed by comparing mean daily stool frequency before and after treatment initiation and monitoring for adverse events. Clinical responders were classified as patients who had a reduction in daily stool frequency of ≥50% at 2–3 months in whom the drug was continued. Results Thirty-one (21 (67.7%) female, mean age at commencement 46.6 years) patients with refractory BAD received liraglutide between November 2022 and July 2026. Bile acid sequestrants were ineffective or intolerable in all patients. Clinical response occurred in 19 (61.3%) patients and a partial response in a further seven (22.6%). Among clinical responders, mean daily stool frequency fell from 10.4 at baseline to 3.0 at 2–3 months (p<0.001). More responders were female, had type II BAD and were passing 10 or more stools per day at baseline. In addition, mean weight was lower and mean daily stool frequency higher at baseline in clinical responders. Only one patient discontinued liraglutide due to adverse events. Conclusions Liraglutide is an effective treatment for refractory BAD and is well tolerated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontline Gastroenterology
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2026-104021
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and tolerability of liraglutide for refractory bile acid diarrhoea

Christopher J. Black, Melanie S Cuffe, Alexander Charles Ford, Dan Greer et al.
1 links
Frontline Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Efficacy and tolerability of liraglutide for refractory bile acid diarrhoea

Christopher J. Black, Melanie S Cuffe, Alexander Charles Ford, Dan Greer, Mais Khasawneh, Angelina Cham
article en

Abstract

Background Bile acid sequestrants are used for the treatment of bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) but they are not always effective and may be tolerated poorly. Other treatment options for BAD are limited. Both randomised controlled trial and case series data suggest that liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, may be effective in BAD but studies are scarce. Aims To report efficacy and tolerability of liraglutide in a cohort of patients with refractory BAD who had either not responded to or were intolerant of the bile acid sequestrants colestyramine and colesevelam. Methods Data were collected prospectively for patients with refractory BAD (7-day 23-seleno-25-homo-tauro-cholic acid retention <15%) receiving liraglutide in Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Clinical response to, and tolerability of, liraglutide was assessed by comparing mean daily stool frequency before and after treatment initiation and monitoring for adverse events. Clinical responders were classified as patients who had a reduction in daily stool frequency of ≥50% at 2–3 months in whom the drug was continued. Results Thirty-one (21 (67.7%) female, mean age at commencement 46.6 years) patients with refractory BAD received liraglutide between November 2022 and July 2026. Bile acid sequestrants were ineffective or intolerable in all patients. Clinical response occurred in 19 (61.3%) patients and a partial response in a further seven (22.6%). Among clinical responders, mean daily stool frequency fell from 10.4 at baseline to 3.0 at 2–3 months (p<0.001). More responders were female, had type II BAD and were passing 10 or more stools per day at baseline. In addition, mean weight was lower and mean daily stool frequency higher at baseline in clinical responders. Only one patient discontinued liraglutide due to adverse events. Conclusions Liraglutide is an effective treatment for refractory BAD and is well tolerated.

Frontline Gastroenterology
University of Leeds (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), St James's University Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon