Measurement, Meaning, and Justice: Stitching Paradigms Across a Century of Social Service Review

Exploring social work epistemology, this article traces the epistemological evolution of Social Service Review (SSR) publications from 1927 to the present. We identify three broad epistemic eras in the social sciences and then group articles accordingly: positivism (1920s–present); socially situated, constructed epistemologies (1960–present); and critical epistemologies of liberation and repair (1990s–present). Our findings demonstrate that SSR articles have never endorsed a single epistemology but straddle the line between professional and disciplinary responsibilities. Rather than pit epistemic traditions as rivals, this moment calls for stitching across them—weaving measurement into conversation with meaning, critique with evidence, and empirical inquiry with justice and repair.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Service Review
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/743611
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement, Meaning, and Justice: Stitching Paradigms Across a Century of Social Service Review

Gina Miranda Samuels, Odessa González Benson
Social Service Review
Social Work Education and Practice
article

Measurement, Meaning, and Justice: Stitching Paradigms Across a Century of Social Service Review

Gina Miranda Samuels, Odessa González Benson
article en

Abstract

Exploring social work epistemology, this article traces the epistemological evolution of Social Service Review (SSR) publications from 1927 to the present. We identify three broad epistemic eras in the social sciences and then group articles accordingly: positivism (1920s–present); socially situated, constructed epistemologies (1960–present); and critical epistemologies of liberation and repair (1990s–present). Our findings demonstrate that SSR articles have never endorsed a single epistemology but straddle the line between professional and disciplinary responsibilities. Rather than pit epistemic traditions as rivals, this moment calls for stitching across them—weaving measurement into conversation with meaning, critique with evidence, and empirical inquiry with justice and repair.

Social Service Review
University of Michigan (US), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon