Leveraging Recourse and Size Bounds for OnlineKnapsack with Removable Items

In the online unweighted knapsack problem, items arrive sequentially and must be accepted or rejected immediately for a bounded-capacity knapsack, aiming to maximize the total size of accepted items. When decisions are irrevocable, no algorithm achieves a non-trivial competitive ratio. An essential relaxation that circumvents this impossibility is to allow previously accepted items to be removed from the knapsack (a.k.a. removal). In this work, we investigate possible further improvements on the competitive ratio with removal by bringing together two other previously proposed model extensions: knowledge of an upper bound on the item sizes (a.k.a. bound awareness) and ability to reinsert previously rejected items(a.k.a.recourse). Our contributions are twofold. First, we establish close upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio under bound awareness, removal and recourse. We show that significant improvements on the best known competitive ratio are possible when the upper bound on the item sizes is not too restrictive and only few uses of recourse are available. Second, we introduce the notion of adaptive online algorithms which do not require to know any upper bound on the item sizes but still achieve performance guarantees comparable to the ones obtained under the bound awareness model.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.40290
Primary Topic
Optimization and Search Problems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Leveraging Recourse and Size Bounds for OnlineKnapsack with Removable Items

Laurent Gourvès, Panagiotis Patsilinakos, Aris Pagourtzis, Dimitris A. Fotakis
arXiv (Cornell University)
Optimization and Search Problems
preprint

Leveraging Recourse and Size Bounds for OnlineKnapsack with Removable Items

Laurent Gourvès, Panagiotis Patsilinakos, Aris Pagourtzis, Dimitris A. Fotakis
preprint en

Abstract

In the online unweighted knapsack problem, items arrive sequentially and must be accepted or rejected immediately for a bounded-capacity knapsack, aiming to maximize the total size of accepted items. When decisions are irrevocable, no algorithm achieves a non-trivial competitive ratio. An essential relaxation that circumvents this impossibility is to allow previously accepted items to be removed from the knapsack (a.k.a. removal). In this work, we investigate possible further improvements on the competitive ratio with removal by bringing together two other previously proposed model extensions: knowledge of an upper bound on the item sizes (a.k.a. bound awareness) and ability to reinsert previously rejected items(a.k.a.recourse). Our contributions are twofold. First, we establish close upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio under bound awareness, removal and recourse. We show that significant improvements on the best known competitive ratio are possible when the upper bound on the item sizes is not too restrictive and only few uses of recourse are available. Second, we introduce the notion of adaptive online algorithms which do not require to know any upper bound on the item sizes but still achieve performance guarantees comparable to the ones obtained under the bound awareness model.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Optimization and Search Problems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Leveraging Recourse and Size Bounds for OnlineKnapsack with Removable Items — Laurent Gourvès, Panagiotis Patsilinakos, et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS