The Permissibility of Ahl al-Kitāb's Slaughter in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Critical Analysis in the Context of Contemporary Western Muslim Communities

Abstract The question of whether Muslims residing in Western countries may consume the meat slaughtered by Christians and Jews — collectively designated in Islamic jurisprudence as Ahl al-Kitāb (People of the Book) — constitutes one of the most practically significant yet academically under-examined debates confronting Muslim communities in the United Kingdom and across Europe. The rapid growth of the Muslim population in Western countries, combined with everyday expectations of social participation in multicultural environments, makes this a pressing jurisprudential and pastoral concern. The Qurʾin explicitly permits the food of Ahl al-Kitāb in Sūrat al-Māʾida (5:5), a verse accepted as non-abrogated by the overwhelming consensus of classical and contemporary Muslim scholars. The Prophetic Sunnah further corroborates this permission, as does the practice of the Companions of the Prophet ﷺ. All four major Sunnī schools of law — Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Shāfiʿī, and Ḥanbalī — affirm the permissibility of Ahl al-Kitāb slaughter, with varying conditions attached. Yet a striking paradox exists: the majority of Muslims in the United Kingdom and Europe, particularly those of South Asian heritage, routinely avoid non-certified meat in the belief that it is categorically prohibited. This article critically examines the Qurʾinānic and Hadith evidence alongside classical jurisprudential positions, surveys the contemporary fatwā landscape in Western Islamic institutions, and analyses the social, cultural, and commercial factors driving the gap between textual permission and actual community practice. The article concludes that the restriction prevalent among Western Muslims is primarily cultural and identity-driven rather than grounded in authoritative jurisprudential evidence, and calls for renewed scholarly engagement with Muslim communities on this important and practically consequential question. Keywords: Ahl al-Kitāb, ḥalāl, Islamic jurisprudence, food law, Western Muslims, United Kingdom, fatwā, fiqh, slaughter, Qurʾān, Sūrat al-Māʾida

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23818284
Primary Topic
Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Permissibility of Ahl al-Kitāb's Slaughter in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Critical Analysis in the Context of Contemporary Western Muslim Communities

Anees ur Rehman Siddiqui
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
preprint

The Permissibility of Ahl al-Kitāb's Slaughter in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Critical Analysis in the Context of Contemporary Western Muslim Communities

Anees ur Rehman Siddiqui
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract The question of whether Muslims residing in Western countries may consume the meat slaughtered by Christians and Jews — collectively designated in Islamic jurisprudence as Ahl al-Kitāb (People of the Book) — constitutes one of the most practically significant yet academically under-examined debates confronting Muslim communities in the United Kingdom and across Europe. The rapid growth of the Muslim population in Western countries, combined with everyday expectations of social participation in multicultural environments, makes this a pressing jurisprudential and pastoral concern. The Qurʾin explicitly permits the food of Ahl al-Kitāb in Sūrat al-Māʾida (5:5), a verse accepted as non-abrogated by the overwhelming consensus of classical and contemporary Muslim scholars. The Prophetic Sunnah further corroborates this permission, as does the practice of the Companions of the Prophet ﷺ. All four major Sunnī schools of law — Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Shāfiʿī, and Ḥanbalī — affirm the permissibility of Ahl al-Kitāb slaughter, with varying conditions attached. Yet a striking paradox exists: the majority of Muslims in the United Kingdom and Europe, particularly those of South Asian heritage, routinely avoid non-certified meat in the belief that it is categorically prohibited. This article critically examines the Qurʾinānic and Hadith evidence alongside classical jurisprudential positions, surveys the contemporary fatwā landscape in Western Islamic institutions, and analyses the social, cultural, and commercial factors driving the gap between textual permission and actual community practice. The article concludes that the restriction prevalent among Western Muslims is primarily cultural and identity-driven rather than grounded in authoritative jurisprudential evidence, and calls for renewed scholarly engagement with Muslim communities on this important and practically consequential question. Keywords: Ahl al-Kitāb, ḥalāl, Islamic jurisprudence, food law, Western Muslims, United Kingdom, fatwā, fiqh, slaughter, Qurʾān, Sūrat al-Māʾida

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Permissibility of Ahl al-Kitāb's Slaughter in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Critical Analysis in the Context of Contemporary Western Muslim Communities — Anees ur Rehman Siddiqui · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS