Becoming creative cyborgs: What role(s) for GenAI in the creative writing classroom?

This article reports on my action research study exploring the integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into creative writing pedagogy at higher education level. Over twelve months, I conducted six pedagogical experiments across three London institutions, engaging fifty-two students in exploring AI’s functional dimensions: as ideation catalyst, collaborative tool, scaffolding mechanism, editorial assistant, research facilitator and assessment instrument. Using a critical realist framework, I examine what emerged from this systematic investigation: GenAI demonstrates clear affordances in particular contexts (research, translation, ideation generation) but significant limitations in others (editorial feedback, assessment, true creative collaboration). Students across all cohorts showed sophisticated critical awareness of AI’s training processes and ethical implications, and most remained cautious about deploying AI as a creative tool. The article argues that engaging with GenAI’s weaknesses might be its greatest pedagogical strength.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TEXT
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.173374
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Becoming creative cyborgs: What role(s) for GenAI in the creative writing classroom?

Ray Grewel
3 links
TEXT
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Becoming creative cyborgs: What role(s) for GenAI in the creative writing classroom?

Ray Grewel
article en

Abstract

This article reports on my action research study exploring the integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into creative writing pedagogy at higher education level. Over twelve months, I conducted six pedagogical experiments across three London institutions, engaging fifty-two students in exploring AI’s functional dimensions: as ideation catalyst, collaborative tool, scaffolding mechanism, editorial assistant, research facilitator and assessment instrument. Using a critical realist framework, I examine what emerged from this systematic investigation: GenAI demonstrates clear affordances in particular contexts (research, translation, ideation generation) but significant limitations in others (editorial feedback, assessment, true creative collaboration). Students across all cohorts showed sophisticated critical awareness of AI’s training processes and ethical implications, and most remained cautious about deploying AI as a creative tool. The article argues that engaging with GenAI’s weaknesses might be its greatest pedagogical strength.

TEXTVol. 30(2)
University of the Arts London (GB)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Becoming creative cyborgs: What role(s) for GenAI in the creative writing classroom? — Ray Grewel · TEXT (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS