Associations Between Patients' Perceptions of Physiotherapist Communication and Psychological Responses in Frozen Shoulder: A Multicentre Cross‐Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: Frozen shoulder (FS) is often accompanied by uncertainty, low mood, and catastrophizing thoughts. Communication during physiotherapy consultations may influence psychological responses and recovery expectations, although how patients perceive clinician-delivered information remains unclear. Understanding these perceptions may help optimise patient-centred rehabilitation and improve communication strategies during clinical encounters. AIM: To investigate the associations between patients' perceptions of clinician-delivered information and recovery expectations, perceived need for reassurance, emotional state, and pain magnification and helplessness in individuals with FS. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional online survey was conducted. Individuals with a diagnosis of FS completed a 31-item multiple-choice questionnaire administered via Google Forms. Participants were recruited from three physiotherapy clinics in Italy between April and July 2023. RESULTS: Following a formal diagnosis of FS, a total of 110 Italian participants were prospectively recruited. Participants who perceived clinician-delivered information as worrying, anxiety-inducing, unhelpful, unreassuring, or discouraging were significantly more likely to report less favourable recovery expectations (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). Overall, these perceptions were consistently associated with negative emotional states (p < 0.01), although some associations appeared paradoxical. Associations with catastrophizing were heterogeneous, with some catastrophizing-related thoughts showing significant associations with negatively perceived communication, whereas others did not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceptions of clinician-delivered information were associated with recovery expectations and selected catastrophizing-related thoughts in individuals with FS. Emotional state showed less consistent associations, suggesting that additional factors may contribute to emotional responses. Given the cross-sectional design, causal inferences cannot be drawn, and longitudinal and interventional studies are warranted to clarify the prognostic significance, and potential clinical implications of these associations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Musculoskeletal Care
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70293
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations Between Patients' Perceptions of Physiotherapist Communication and Psychological Responses in Frozen Shoulder: A Multicentre Cross‐Sectional Study

Liesbet De Baets, Filip Struyf, Fabrizio Brindisino, Giacomo Rossettini et al.
4 links
Musculoskeletal Care
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Associations Between Patients' Perceptions of Physiotherapist Communication and Psychological Responses in Frozen Shoulder: A Multicentre Cross‐Sectional Study

Liesbet De Baets, Filip Struyf, Fabrizio Brindisino, Giacomo Rossettini, Santiago Navarro‐Ledesma, Andrea Turolla, Mauro Crestani, Giacomo Muscatello, Andrea De Santis
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Frozen shoulder (FS) is often accompanied by uncertainty, low mood, and catastrophizing thoughts. Communication during physiotherapy consultations may influence psychological responses and recovery expectations, although how patients perceive clinician-delivered information remains unclear. Understanding these perceptions may help optimise patient-centred rehabilitation and improve communication strategies during clinical encounters. AIM: To investigate the associations between patients' perceptions of clinician-delivered information and recovery expectations, perceived need for reassurance, emotional state, and pain magnification and helplessness in individuals with FS. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional online survey was conducted. Individuals with a diagnosis of FS completed a 31-item multiple-choice questionnaire administered via Google Forms. Participants were recruited from three physiotherapy clinics in Italy between April and July 2023. RESULTS: Following a formal diagnosis of FS, a total of 110 Italian participants were prospectively recruited. Participants who perceived clinician-delivered information as worrying, anxiety-inducing, unhelpful, unreassuring, or discouraging were significantly more likely to report less favourable recovery expectations (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). Overall, these perceptions were consistently associated with negative emotional states (p < 0.01), although some associations appeared paradoxical. Associations with catastrophizing were heterogeneous, with some catastrophizing-related thoughts showing significant associations with negatively perceived communication, whereas others did not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceptions of clinician-delivered information were associated with recovery expectations and selected catastrophizing-related thoughts in individuals with FS. Emotional state showed less consistent associations, suggesting that additional factors may contribute to emotional responses. Given the cross-sectional design, causal inferences cannot be drawn, and longitudinal and interventional studies are warranted to clarify the prognostic significance, and potential clinical implications of these associations.

Musculoskeletal CareVol. 24(4)
University of Verona (IT), University of Molise (IT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Antwerp (BE), Universidad de Granada (ES), Health Sciences University (GB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT), Pain in Motion (BE), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES), Bournemouth University (GB), University of Bologna (IT), KU Leuven (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon