Punish me, Father! Medieval and early modern penitential rituals as the construction of the masochistic male body

Abstract This article examines how medieval and early modern penitential rituals in monasteries physically constructed submissive, masochistic male sexuality, standing in sharp contrast with the dominant sexuality of laymen. By analyzing pastoral recommendations, such as Thomas of Chobham’s advice to rub the erect penis with stinging nettles or Jean Gerson’s rules for flagellation intensity, I argue that masochism was essentially the only form of sexuality permitted for clergy. Because the Church strictly condemned conventional sexual release, self-inflicted pain was often the only available way for monks to touch their erogenous zones, serving as a direct substitute for masturbation. By comparing these sexually charged practices with extreme mortification of the flesh, like that of the mystic Henry Suso and early unsanctioned flagellants, the study establishes concrete criteria for distinguishing ‘masturbatory’ pain from just self-harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-026-00441-1
Primary Topic
Medieval Literature and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Punish me, Father! Medieval and early modern penitential rituals as the construction of the masochistic male body

Alexandra Umarova
postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies
Medieval Literature and History
article

Punish me, Father! Medieval and early modern penitential rituals as the construction of the masochistic male body

Alexandra Umarova
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how medieval and early modern penitential rituals in monasteries physically constructed submissive, masochistic male sexuality, standing in sharp contrast with the dominant sexuality of laymen. By analyzing pastoral recommendations, such as Thomas of Chobham’s advice to rub the erect penis with stinging nettles or Jean Gerson’s rules for flagellation intensity, I argue that masochism was essentially the only form of sexuality permitted for clergy. Because the Church strictly condemned conventional sexual release, self-inflicted pain was often the only available way for monks to touch their erogenous zones, serving as a direct substitute for masturbation. By comparing these sexually charged practices with extreme mortification of the flesh, like that of the mystic Henry Suso and early unsanctioned flagellants, the study establishes concrete criteria for distinguishing ‘masturbatory’ pain from just self-harm.

postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies
University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Medieval Literature and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon