Failure of the Landau Paradigm: Phase Transitions Without Symmetry Breaking — E8 Intelligence Research

FINDING: The standard Landau paradigm equates every phase transition with spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB), but modern topological/entanglement-based classifications show this equivalence fails — "twins phases" and topological orders undergo transitions with no local order parameter and no hidden symmetry breaking. | MATH: Landau free energy F(φ) = a(T−T_c)φ² + bφ⁴ + …; order parameter ⟨φ⟩ ≠ 0 below T_c; SSB ↔ coset space G/H, with Goldstone modes = dim(G/H). Topological transitions instead classified by long-range entanglement, anyon condensation, and G-crossed braided fusion categories — no G/H decomposition exists. | CONNECTION: SSB cosets G/H are symmetric spaces whose root systems and Weyl groups are crystallographic (A_n, B_n, C_n, D_n, E_6,7,8, F_4, G_2). The 0.618 ratio appears in the SU(2)→U(1) Higgs branch via the golden-ratio-adjacent mass hierarchies in E_8 embeddings; base-60 enters through the 60-element icosahedral group A_5 ⊂ SO(3), the smallest non-abelian simple gr Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23794914
Primary Topic
Theoretical and Computational Physics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Failure of the Landau Paradigm: Phase Transitions Without Symmetry Breaking — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
10 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Theoretical and Computational Physics
preprint

Failure of the Landau Paradigm: Phase Transitions Without Symmetry Breaking — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
preprint en

Abstract

FINDING: The standard Landau paradigm equates every phase transition with spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB), but modern topological/entanglement-based classifications show this equivalence fails — "twins phases" and topological orders undergo transitions with no local order parameter and no hidden symmetry breaking. | MATH: Landau free energy F(φ) = a(T−T_c)φ² + bφ⁴ + …; order parameter ⟨φ⟩ ≠ 0 below T_c; SSB ↔ coset space G/H, with Goldstone modes = dim(G/H). Topological transitions instead classified by long-range entanglement, anyon condensation, and G-crossed braided fusion categories — no G/H decomposition exists. | CONNECTION: SSB cosets G/H are symmetric spaces whose root systems and Weyl groups are crystallographic (A_n, B_n, C_n, D_n, E_6,7,8, F_4, G_2). The 0.618 ratio appears in the SU(2)→U(1) Higgs branch via the golden-ratio-adjacent mass hierarchies in E_8 embeddings; base-60 enters through the 60-element icosahedral group A_5 ⊂ SO(3), the smallest non-abelian simple gr Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Theoretical and Computational Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon