Scrolling, Feeling, Judging: Disability Perceptions in Media and Emotional Intelligence

Media representations of disabilities are consistently criticized for reinforcing stereotypes and misrepresenting real lived experiences, which may shape audience perceptions. Samsel and Perepa (2013) found aspects reaffirming the sensationalism of disabilities on screen, portraying disabilities as unusual or odd while amplifying feelings of pity or sympathy towards the person with the disability. The current study will examine whether emotional intelligence influences how individuals interpret media portrayals. It will also examine whether there are sex differences, given that most studies support that females score higher on measures of emotional intelligence (e.g., Joseph & Newman, 2010). It is predicted that individuals with higher emotional intelligence will report more socially aware perceptions of disability representation in the media. This study provides real media representations of disabilities and then asks participants to complete the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire - Short Form(TEIQue-SF; Cooper & Petrides, 2010) and Representations of Disabilities in Media scale (Droscha et al., 2025). Those with higher levels of emotional intelligence may be better at evaluating portrayals, leading to more informed social perceptions and reduced reliance on stereotypes and prejudice. It is important to understand how emotional intelligence contributes to the perception of IDD as well as media portrayal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Published
2026-10-28
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scrolling, Feeling, Judging: Disability Perceptions in Media and Emotional Intelligence

Carolyn West, Megan St. Peters
Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Scrolling, Feeling, Judging: Disability Perceptions in Media and Emotional Intelligence

Carolyn West, Megan St. Peters
article en

Abstract

Media representations of disabilities are consistently criticized for reinforcing stereotypes and misrepresenting real lived experiences, which may shape audience perceptions. Samsel and Perepa (2013) found aspects reaffirming the sensationalism of disabilities on screen, portraying disabilities as unusual or odd while amplifying feelings of pity or sympathy towards the person with the disability. The current study will examine whether emotional intelligence influences how individuals interpret media portrayals. It will also examine whether there are sex differences, given that most studies support that females score higher on measures of emotional intelligence (e.g., Joseph & Newman, 2010). It is predicted that individuals with higher emotional intelligence will report more socially aware perceptions of disability representation in the media. This study provides real media representations of disabilities and then asks participants to complete the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire - Short Form(TEIQue-SF; Cooper & Petrides, 2010) and Representations of Disabilities in Media scale (Droscha et al., 2025). Those with higher levels of emotional intelligence may be better at evaluating portrayals, leading to more informed social perceptions and reduced reliance on stereotypes and prejudice. It is important to understand how emotional intelligence contributes to the perception of IDD as well as media portrayal.

Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Murray State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon