Time Spent Above 90% and 95% of VO2max During Three High-Intensity Interval Cycling Protocols

Maximising time spent at high fractions of maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) is considered an important target of high-intensity interval training (HIIT). This study compared the accumulated time spent at ≥90% and ≥95% of V̇O2max during three work- and effort-matched cycling HIIT protocols. Twelve level 3–4 male cyclists completed Short HIIT (15 × 43.5 s work/43.5 s recovery), Long HIIT (4 × 3 min work/3 min recovery), and decreasing power output HIIT (6 × 114.5 s work/114.5 s recovery) in a randomised crossover design. Pulmonary gas exchange was measured breath-by-breath, and the accumulated time above 90% and 95% of V̇O2max was calculated for each session. Significant differences were observed between protocols for both outcomes. Long HIIT produced greater time above 90% of V̇O2max (580 ± 61.8 s) than decreasing power output HIIT (512 ± 77 s) and short HIIT (422 ± 90 s). A similar pattern was observed above 95% of V̇O2max, with long HIIT (404 ± 126 s) exceeding decreasing power output HIIT (308 ± 131 s) and short HIIT (193 ± 69 s). Peak blood lactate concentrations did not differ between protocols. These findings suggest that, under matched 1:1 work-to-recovery conditions, longer intervals may provide a greater acute near-maximal aerobic stimulus than shorter intervals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Of Science & Cycling
Published
2026-10-28
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time Spent Above 90% and 95% of VO2max During Three High-Intensity Interval Cycling Protocols

B Ünsal
Journal Of Science & Cycling
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Time Spent Above 90% and 95% of VO2max During Three High-Intensity Interval Cycling Protocols

B Ünsal
article en

Abstract

Maximising time spent at high fractions of maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) is considered an important target of high-intensity interval training (HIIT). This study compared the accumulated time spent at ≥90% and ≥95% of V̇O2max during three work- and effort-matched cycling HIIT protocols. Twelve level 3–4 male cyclists completed Short HIIT (15 × 43.5 s work/43.5 s recovery), Long HIIT (4 × 3 min work/3 min recovery), and decreasing power output HIIT (6 × 114.5 s work/114.5 s recovery) in a randomised crossover design. Pulmonary gas exchange was measured breath-by-breath, and the accumulated time above 90% and 95% of V̇O2max was calculated for each session. Significant differences were observed between protocols for both outcomes. Long HIIT produced greater time above 90% of V̇O2max (580 ± 61.8 s) than decreasing power output HIIT (512 ± 77 s) and short HIIT (422 ± 90 s). A similar pattern was observed above 95% of V̇O2max, with long HIIT (404 ± 126 s) exceeding decreasing power output HIIT (308 ± 131 s) and short HIIT (193 ± 69 s). Peak blood lactate concentrations did not differ between protocols. These findings suggest that, under matched 1:1 work-to-recovery conditions, longer intervals may provide a greater acute near-maximal aerobic stimulus than shorter intervals.

Journal Of Science & Cycling
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon