Generative Artificial Intelligence in Architectural Research: Limits of Regulation

Purpose : The aim is to outline the problem area, define the boundaries of what is subject to regulation, distinguish ineffective regulatory strategies from promising ones, and identify likely trajectories as they apply to master’s and doctoral dissertations, primarily in architectural disciplines. Design/methodology/approach: A comparative analysis of Russian and international regulatory, publishing, and academic documents from 2023–2026 and empirical studies on detectors and the authenticity of generated text, experience in drafting regulations for a dissertation council in architectural disciplines. Research findings: Five areas of uncertainty are identified: authorship and responsibility, text as evidence of competence, reliability and plausibility, detectability and the flip side of metrics, and confidentiality and symmetry of expert evaluation. Three boundaries of regulation are defined, the ineffectiveness of a complete ban, total control, detectors as evidence, percentage quotas, regulation of specific products, and non-interference is demonstrated, transferable solutions from local legislation are described, i.e., functional classification, disclosure instead of prohibition, presumption of good faith and procedural safeguards, symmetry of requirements, industry standards, and technological neutrality. Practical implications : Transferable solutions of a local regulation include a function-based classification of use, disclosure instead of prohibition, a presumption of good faith with procedural guarantees, symmetrical requirements for candidates and reviewers, discipline-specific rules for images and reconstructions, and technological neutrality. Originality/value: The problem is shown to be epistemic and institutional rather than technological. The centre of gravity of assessment shifts from the manuscript to the oral defense of a thesis and verifiable artefacts. The restoration-theory principle of distinguishability of original and supplemented material is applied to the digital artefacts of a dissertation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel nogo universiteta JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2026-28-5-136-147
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Architectural Research: Limits of Regulation

Худин Алексей Александрович
Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel nogo universiteta JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture
Architecture and Computational Design
article

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Architectural Research: Limits of Regulation

Худин Алексей Александрович
article en

Abstract

Purpose : The aim is to outline the problem area, define the boundaries of what is subject to regulation, distinguish ineffective regulatory strategies from promising ones, and identify likely trajectories as they apply to master’s and doctoral dissertations, primarily in architectural disciplines. Design/methodology/approach: A comparative analysis of Russian and international regulatory, publishing, and academic documents from 2023–2026 and empirical studies on detectors and the authenticity of generated text, experience in drafting regulations for a dissertation council in architectural disciplines. Research findings: Five areas of uncertainty are identified: authorship and responsibility, text as evidence of competence, reliability and plausibility, detectability and the flip side of metrics, and confidentiality and symmetry of expert evaluation. Three boundaries of regulation are defined, the ineffectiveness of a complete ban, total control, detectors as evidence, percentage quotas, regulation of specific products, and non-interference is demonstrated, transferable solutions from local legislation are described, i.e., functional classification, disclosure instead of prohibition, presumption of good faith and procedural safeguards, symmetry of requirements, industry standards, and technological neutrality. Practical implications : Transferable solutions of a local regulation include a function-based classification of use, disclosure instead of prohibition, a presumption of good faith with procedural guarantees, symmetrical requirements for candidates and reviewers, discipline-specific rules for images and reconstructions, and technological neutrality. Originality/value: The problem is shown to be epistemic and institutional rather than technological. The centre of gravity of assessment shifts from the manuscript to the oral defense of a thesis and verifiable artefacts. The restoration-theory principle of distinguishability of original and supplemented material is applied to the digital artefacts of a dissertation.

Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel nogo universiteta JOURNAL of Construction and ArchitectureVol. 28(5)
Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Architecture and Computational Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon