Advances in the Leiden Power-Heart Rate model

Purpose: To better model riders’ physiological response to prolonged exertion beyond the non-linear relationship between power and heart rate, with the aim of assessing fitness in the field. Methods: The Leiden PHR model captures the non-trivial relationship between power (external load) and heart rate (internal load), shown to provide insights into a rider’s fitness level 1,2. Because heart rate is influenced by factors beyond recent power history, we modeled the remaining unexplained variance using the machine learning model XGBoost. Additional explanatory variables included cumulative effort (in five alternative ways), atmospheric conditions, geographic location, and current altitude and slope. Feature importance methods were used to assess the relative contribution of variables. Results: As in the earlier models, convolved pedal power was the strongest predictor, followed by a mixture of local parcours properties and cumulative effort indicators. Although atmospheric conditions and geographic location offered some minimal contribution, the same information can be obtained from other variables. The most accurate model used a mixture of variables (R2 = 0.81, compared to R2 = 0.70 for the existing model, with the average error being

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Of Science & Cycling
Published
2026-10-28
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances in the Leiden Power-Heart Rate model

Arno Knobbe
Journal Of Science & Cycling
Sports Performance and Training
article

Advances in the Leiden Power-Heart Rate model

Arno Knobbe
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To better model riders’ physiological response to prolonged exertion beyond the non-linear relationship between power and heart rate, with the aim of assessing fitness in the field. Methods: The Leiden PHR model captures the non-trivial relationship between power (external load) and heart rate (internal load), shown to provide insights into a rider’s fitness level 1,2. Because heart rate is influenced by factors beyond recent power history, we modeled the remaining unexplained variance using the machine learning model XGBoost. Additional explanatory variables included cumulative effort (in five alternative ways), atmospheric conditions, geographic location, and current altitude and slope. Feature importance methods were used to assess the relative contribution of variables. Results: As in the earlier models, convolved pedal power was the strongest predictor, followed by a mixture of local parcours properties and cumulative effort indicators. Although atmospheric conditions and geographic location offered some minimal contribution, the same information can be obtained from other variables. The most accurate model used a mixture of variables (R2 = 0.81, compared to R2 = 0.70 for the existing model, with the average error being

Journal Of Science & Cycling
Leiden University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Advances in the Leiden Power-Heart Rate model — Arno Knobbe · Journal Of Science & Cycling (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS