Hydrosolubility of tricalcium silicate-based bioceramic sealers: an in vitro comparative study.

Bioceramic sealers based on tricalcium silicate are increasingly used in endodontics due to their bioactivity and favorable interaction with periapical tissues. However, their hydrosolubility may compromise long-term sealing ability. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the solubility of BioRoot RCS, Bio-C Sealer, and NeoSealer Flo under moist conditions. A total of 12 standardized specimens (n = 4 per sealer group) were prepared, weighed, and immersed in distilled water in accordance with International Organization for Standardization recommendations (ISO 6876:2012). Specimens were reweighed at 24, 48, 360, 720, and 1440 hours, and mass loss was recorded. Solubility was calculated as the percentage of mass loss. Statistical analysis included 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni and Dunnett T3 tests (α = 0.05). Bio-C Sealer exhibited the highest mean (SD) solubility, 11.56% (1.18%), significantly exceeding the ISO 6876:2012 limit of 3%. BioRoot RCS (5.81% [1.37%]) and NeoSealer Flo (4.97% [1.32%]) also exceeded the ISO threshold but demonstrated greater dimensional stability. Analysis of variance confirmed that there were statistically significant differences among sealers (P < 0.001), but pairwise comparisons showed no significant difference between BioRoot RCS and NeoSealer Flo. While none of the materials fully met the requirements of ISO 6876:2012, BioRoot RCS and NeoSealer Flo demonstrated significantly greater resistance to dissolution than Bio-C Sealer. These findings support their use in clinical scenarios where enhanced stability is essential, although further long-term investigations are recommended.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-11-01
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrosolubility of tricalcium silicate-based bioceramic sealers: an in vitro comparative study.

Michael Ignacio Alcivar Rodríguez, Guillermo Mauricio Aguirre Balseca, María Fernanda Benavides Pérez, Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas
1 links
PubMed
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Hydrosolubility of tricalcium silicate-based bioceramic sealers: an in vitro comparative study.

Michael Ignacio Alcivar Rodríguez, Guillermo Mauricio Aguirre Balseca, María Fernanda Benavides Pérez, Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas
article en

Abstract

Bioceramic sealers based on tricalcium silicate are increasingly used in endodontics due to their bioactivity and favorable interaction with periapical tissues. However, their hydrosolubility may compromise long-term sealing ability. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the solubility of BioRoot RCS, Bio-C Sealer, and NeoSealer Flo under moist conditions. A total of 12 standardized specimens (n = 4 per sealer group) were prepared, weighed, and immersed in distilled water in accordance with International Organization for Standardization recommendations (ISO 6876:2012). Specimens were reweighed at 24, 48, 360, 720, and 1440 hours, and mass loss was recorded. Solubility was calculated as the percentage of mass loss. Statistical analysis included 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni and Dunnett T3 tests (α = 0.05). Bio-C Sealer exhibited the highest mean (SD) solubility, 11.56% (1.18%), significantly exceeding the ISO 6876:2012 limit of 3%. BioRoot RCS (5.81% [1.37%]) and NeoSealer Flo (4.97% [1.32%]) also exceeded the ISO threshold but demonstrated greater dimensional stability. Analysis of variance confirmed that there were statistically significant differences among sealers (P < 0.001), but pairwise comparisons showed no significant difference between BioRoot RCS and NeoSealer Flo. While none of the materials fully met the requirements of ISO 6876:2012, BioRoot RCS and NeoSealer Flo demonstrated significantly greater resistance to dissolution than Bio-C Sealer. These findings support their use in clinical scenarios where enhanced stability is essential, although further long-term investigations are recommended.

PubMedVol. 74(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon