Global Health Security in Jeopardy: How Dismantling USAID Weakens Uganda's Global Health Security Architecture and How Remittances Might Be a Game Changer

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) had been a leading contributor to Uganda’s health care and disease prevention and treatment responses. In this paper I analyze how dismantling USAID has had negative impacts on Uganda’s health financing and consequently, on global health security. However, it this crisis opens up an opportunity for Uganda to work towards more health resilient systems that do not need to rely heavily on foreign assistance. Uganda is still below the required 12% domestic resource allocation to health in its national budget as stipulated under the Abuja Declaration. I argue that although foreign assistance is good to the extent it helps build national capacity, it may also contribute to weakening individual country health systems structures if not used prudently.Past a certain threshold, foreign assistance makes countries vulnerable to donor shifts as a result of over- dependence on donor funds. As a result, countries like Uganda are then more vulnerable to epidemics and disease outbreaks at a time when little or no financial aid is available to them by donors. The existing weak health structures make the situation even worse. Global health security is then jeopardized because there are greater risks of diseases being spread beyond the country’s borders and a looming possibility of eroding past gains. I argue that global health security heavily depends on how resilient a country’s health system is in the wake of an abrupt and substantial loss of funding, and Uganda’s priority should be strengthening its health systems in order to promote global health security.The first section of this paper demonstrates the role played by the U.S. in Uganda’s Health Security. The second section discusses the impact of dismantling USAID on Uganda’s health security. Section three explores strengthening Uganda’s health security under the America First Global Health Strategy, and section four addresses leveraging remittances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23758087
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Health Security in Jeopardy: How Dismantling USAID Weakens Uganda's Global Health Security Architecture and How Remittances Might Be a Game Changer

Judith Murungi
8 links
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH
Global Security and Public Health
article

Global Health Security in Jeopardy: How Dismantling USAID Weakens Uganda's Global Health Security Architecture and How Remittances Might Be a Game Changer

Judith Murungi
article en

Abstract

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) had been a leading contributor to Uganda’s health care and disease prevention and treatment responses. In this paper I analyze how dismantling USAID has had negative impacts on Uganda’s health financing and consequently, on global health security. However, it this crisis opens up an opportunity for Uganda to work towards more health resilient systems that do not need to rely heavily on foreign assistance. Uganda is still below the required 12% domestic resource allocation to health in its national budget as stipulated under the Abuja Declaration. I argue that although foreign assistance is good to the extent it helps build national capacity, it may also contribute to weakening individual country health systems structures if not used prudently.Past a certain threshold, foreign assistance makes countries vulnerable to donor shifts as a result of over- dependence on donor funds. As a result, countries like Uganda are then more vulnerable to epidemics and disease outbreaks at a time when little or no financial aid is available to them by donors. The existing weak health structures make the situation even worse. Global health security is then jeopardized because there are greater risks of diseases being spread beyond the country’s borders and a looming possibility of eroding past gains. I argue that global health security heavily depends on how resilient a country’s health system is in the wake of an abrupt and substantial loss of funding, and Uganda’s priority should be strengthening its health systems in order to promote global health security.The first section of this paper demonstrates the role played by the U.S. in Uganda’s Health Security. The second section discusses the impact of dismantling USAID on Uganda’s health security. Section three explores strengthening Uganda’s health security under the America First Global Health Strategy, and section four addresses leveraging remittances.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH
University of Ottawa (CA)
Partnerships for the goals, Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Global Health Security in Jeopardy: How Dismantling USAID Weakens Uganda's Global Health Security Architecture and How Remittances Might Be a Game Changer — Judith Murungi · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS