Patients’ preferences for accepting risks and uncertainty in AML treatments within European public health care systems: a cross-sectional study in Finland, Italy, and Germany

The aim of this study was to identify what tradeoffs patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are willing to make between different treatment attributes when choosing between chemotherapy and novel targeted therapies involving higher uncertainty, within the context of European publicly funded health‑care systems. A survey with a probabilistic threshold technique and a ranking exercise were distributed to patients with AML in Finland, Germany, and Italy. Respondents (n = 68) were presented with two treatment options described by six attributes. Interval regressions were used to analyze the threshold intervals for each attribute. Mean threshold values for accepting targeted treatment were 82% chance of complete remission, 48% risk of short-term side effects, 10% for long-term side effects, and two weeks for treatment time in hospital. Preference heterogeneity was identified. Complete remission was ranked most important followed by scientific evidence and risk of long-term side effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2026.2752789
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients’ preferences for accepting risks and uncertainty in AML treatments within European public health care systems: a cross-sectional study in Finland, Italy, and Germany

Jennifer Viberg Johansson, Chiara Zingaretti, Giovanni Marconi, Samantha Nier et al.
Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Patients’ preferences for accepting risks and uncertainty in AML treatments within European public health care systems: a cross-sectional study in Finland, Italy, and Germany

Jennifer Viberg Johansson, Chiara Zingaretti, Giovanni Marconi, Samantha Nier, Lars Bullinger, Catharina G. M. Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, Giorgia Simonetti, Caroline Akemi Heckman, Mika Kontro, Karl Haller, Ulrik Kihlbom, Sari Kytölä, Åsa Grauman, Giovanni Martinelli
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify what tradeoffs patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are willing to make between different treatment attributes when choosing between chemotherapy and novel targeted therapies involving higher uncertainty, within the context of European publicly funded health‑care systems. A survey with a probabilistic threshold technique and a ranking exercise were distributed to patients with AML in Finland, Germany, and Italy. Respondents (n = 68) were presented with two treatment options described by six attributes. Interval regressions were used to analyze the threshold intervals for each attribute. Mean threshold values for accepting targeted treatment were 82% chance of complete remission, 48% risk of short-term side effects, 10% for long-term side effects, and two weeks for treatment time in hospital. Preference heterogeneity was identified. Complete remission was ranked most important followed by scientific evidence and risk of long-term side effects.

Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
Uppsala University (SE), University of Helsinki (FI), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna (IT), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria (IT), Istituto di Ematologia di Bologna (IT), Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FI), Finnish Cancer Institute (FI), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Bologna (IT), University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon