Biomechanical effects of load-carrying in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling study

Load carrying is a common activity during adolescence, yet its biomechanical consequences for the structurally asymmetric spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remain poorly understood. This study investigated how load magnitude, carrying height, and side of application influence spinal loading and paraspinal muscle forces in AIS. A subject-specific musculoskeletal model of a 16-year-old female with a 59° right-convex thoracic curve was used to simulate bilateral and unilateral load carrying at the hand, chest, and above-shoulder levels, with loads corresponding to 5%, 10%, and 15% of body weight. Intervertebral compressive and lateral forces and erector spinae (ES) and multifidus (MF) muscle forces were evaluated. Spinal loading increased progressively with load magnitude and carrying height. At 15% body weight, compressive forces at the curve apex increased from 511-566 N at hand level to 721-831 N above the shoulder. Unilateral carrying produced distinct side-dependent responses: convex-side carrying generated greater compressive forces, whereas concave-side carrying generated greater lateral forces, which were concentrated around the curve apex. Paraspinal muscles also exhibited muscle-specific responses. ES forces primarily reflected the imposed external asymmetry, with unilateral carrying eliciting predominantly contralateral recruitment, whereas MF maintained a characteristic convex-side dominance concentrated around the curve apex. These findings demonstrate that load carrying in AIS produces a coupled biomechanical response governed by both the external loading configuration and the pre-existing structural asymmetry of the spine, highlighting the importance of considering loading direction and muscular adaptation alongside load magnitude when evaluating everyday carrying activities in AIS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.27.762384
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Biomechanical effects of load-carrying in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling study

Kaushik Mukherjee, Rajdeep Ghosh, Rounak Bhattacharya, Anoop Chawla et al.
1 links
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
preprint

Biomechanical effects of load-carrying in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling study

Kaushik Mukherjee, Rajdeep Ghosh, Rounak Bhattacharya, Anoop Chawla, Rajesh Malhotra, Bhavuk Garg
preprint en

Abstract

Load carrying is a common activity during adolescence, yet its biomechanical consequences for the structurally asymmetric spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remain poorly understood. This study investigated how load magnitude, carrying height, and side of application influence spinal loading and paraspinal muscle forces in AIS. A subject-specific musculoskeletal model of a 16-year-old female with a 59° right-convex thoracic curve was used to simulate bilateral and unilateral load carrying at the hand, chest, and above-shoulder levels, with loads corresponding to 5%, 10%, and 15% of body weight. Intervertebral compressive and lateral forces and erector spinae (ES) and multifidus (MF) muscle forces were evaluated. Spinal loading increased progressively with load magnitude and carrying height. At 15% body weight, compressive forces at the curve apex increased from 511-566 N at hand level to 721-831 N above the shoulder. Unilateral carrying produced distinct side-dependent responses: convex-side carrying generated greater compressive forces, whereas concave-side carrying generated greater lateral forces, which were concentrated around the curve apex. Paraspinal muscles also exhibited muscle-specific responses. ES forces primarily reflected the imposed external asymmetry, with unilateral carrying eliciting predominantly contralateral recruitment, whereas MF maintained a characteristic convex-side dominance concentrated around the curve apex. These findings demonstrate that load carrying in AIS produces a coupled biomechanical response governed by both the external loading configuration and the pre-existing structural asymmetry of the spine, highlighting the importance of considering loading direction and muscular adaptation alongside load magnitude when evaluating everyday carrying activities in AIS.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
National Institute of Technology Agartala (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
All-India Institute of Medical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Good health and well-being
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon