The effects of leader quality on collective decision-making in changing environments

Some groups repeatedly choose between making their own decisions and deferring to a leader. To make such governance choices, groups must consider their own performance and coordination against the performance of a leader choosing for them. This can be difficult, especially in changing problem environments. In an experiment with groups of four, we investigated how quickly participants would recognise the quality of the leader deciding for them in environments, whether leader quality influenced the quality of group decisions, and whether leader decisions influenced how the participants in groups interacted. We found that groups with bad leaders were slow to reject the leader, if they rejected the leader at all. Leader quality was shown to impact the quality of group decisions, with groups with bad leaders adapting more slowly and locking onto wrong options more often. However, our experiment did not demonstrate differences in how individuals in the groups interacted, when comparing groups with good and bad leaders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23781700
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of leader quality on collective decision-making in changing environments

Henrik Olsson, Mirta Galešić, Joshua Cox
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

The effects of leader quality on collective decision-making in changing environments

Henrik Olsson, Mirta Galešić, Joshua Cox
article en

Abstract

Some groups repeatedly choose between making their own decisions and deferring to a leader. To make such governance choices, groups must consider their own performance and coordination against the performance of a leader choosing for them. This can be difficult, especially in changing problem environments. In an experiment with groups of four, we investigated how quickly participants would recognise the quality of the leader deciding for them in environments, whether leader quality influenced the quality of group decisions, and whether leader decisions influenced how the participants in groups interacted. We found that groups with bad leaders were slow to reject the leader, if they rejected the leader at all. Leader quality was shown to impact the quality of group decisions, with groups with bad leaders adapting more slowly and locking onto wrong options more often. However, our experiment did not demonstrate differences in how individuals in the groups interacted, when comparing groups with good and bad leaders.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complexity Science Hub (AT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon