Constructive chemical discovery through autonomous reasoning and experiment

Making a new reaction often requires chemical knowledge that does not yet exist. Self-driving laboratories and language-model agents now plan, run and optimize experiments rapidly, but deciding what to ask next still requires a chemist in the loop Here we report AIChemist, a robotic chemist for what we call constructive chemical discovery. It decides what to ask next from its own results, settles each question by calculation or experiment, and builds the next design on the answer. Given a silyl-radical-relay concept, AIChemist developed an asymmetric three-component silylcyanation: it established that the solvent effect depended on the oxidant formulation and built the next formulation on this finding, raising the yield from 20% to 67% at 88% enantiomeric excess. For an intermediate of the insecticide broflanilide, it designed a photoredox/nickel C–N coupling route free of nitro-group transformations, at lower estimated cost than the conventional route. When the base favoured by calculation performed poorly, it withdrew that premise and rebuilt the search around the reaction medium, where non-polar toluene raised the product's HPLC yield from 43% to 86%. In both cases, each conclusion extended what the system knew and became the starting point for the next. These results demonstrate a framework for autonomous chemical discovery in which chemical understanding and experimental design evolve together within a closed loop.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemRxiv
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.15011027/v2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Constructive chemical discovery through autonomous reasoning and experiment

Pheng‐Ann Heng, Daqian Bian, Letian Chen, Dong Xing et al.
1 links
ChemRxiv
Machine Learning in Materials Science
preprint

Constructive chemical discovery through autonomous reasoning and experiment

Pheng‐Ann Heng, Daqian Bian, Letian Chen, Dong Xing, Haotian Wu, Jiankai Ge, Haohui Que, Yuanqing Wang, Zilong Yan, Yuzhi Xu, Wenxi Zhai, Yilin Wei, Yuting Wang, Zhenjia Gan, Zhengming Zhang, Yuli Li, Yu Jiang, Chengyi Xing, Bowen Li, Max Wang, Tong Zhu, Yong Lu, Chengwei Ju, Yingcheng Wu
preprint en

Abstract

Making a new reaction often requires chemical knowledge that does not yet exist. Self-driving laboratories and language-model agents now plan, run and optimize experiments rapidly, but deciding what to ask next still requires a chemist in the loop Here we report AIChemist, a robotic chemist for what we call constructive chemical discovery. It decides what to ask next from its own results, settles each question by calculation or experiment, and builds the next design on the answer. Given a silyl-radical-relay concept, AIChemist developed an asymmetric three-component silylcyanation: it established that the solvent effect depended on the oxidant formulation and built the next formulation on this finding, raising the yield from 20% to 67% at 88% enantiomeric excess. For an intermediate of the insecticide broflanilide, it designed a photoredox/nickel C–N coupling route free of nitro-group transformations, at lower estimated cost than the conventional route. When the base favoured by calculation performed poorly, it withdrew that premise and rebuilt the search around the reaction medium, where non-polar toluene raised the product's HPLC yield from 43% to 86%. In both cases, each conclusion extended what the system knew and became the starting point for the next. These results demonstrate a framework for autonomous chemical discovery in which chemical understanding and experimental design evolve together within a closed loop.

ChemRxiv
Northwestern University (US), California Institute of Technology (US), Harvard University (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Toronto (CA), University of Chicago (US), Shanghai Innovation Institute (CN), New York University (US), East China Normal University (CN), Stanford University (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon