Typology and Use-Wear of the Palaeolithic Stone Tools from the Recent Excavations (2015 to 2023) of Shanidar Cave (Iraqi Kurdistan)

Shanidar Cave, Iraqi Kurdistan, is among the most significant Neanderthal sites. Excavations by Ralph Solecki in the 1950s unearthed the remains of at least ten Neanderthals and associated Middle Palaeolithic Mousterian stone tools which have played a crucial role in our understanding of Neanderthal behaviour. Solecki also identified Upper Palaeolithic deposits containing Baradostian tools (broadly equivalent to the Aurignacian industry) separated from the Neanderthal layer by 1 metre of sediment, which he interpreted as reflecting a 10,000-year hiatus. Recent excavations (2015 – present) using single-context excavation, with three-dimensional plotting of all artefacts bigger than 2 cm, have improved our understanding of the site’s inhabitants. Lithics recovered from Shanidar Cave were identified and attributed to typological class. The results of typological analysis show that there is a contextual overlap between typologically Mousterian and Baradostian artefacts, and that there is no evidence for a hiatus in occupation at the site. Blades and bladelets, tool forms not usually associated with Neanderthals, were recovered from secure contexts dating to MIS 5a including from contexts containing Neanderthal skeletal remains. Use-wear analysis conducted using a DINO-LITE Edge digital microscope showed that 106 lithics retain evidence of use. The materials worked include wood, hide, meat and bone, bone, horn and plants. There is no significant difference in worked materials between MIS 5 and MIS 3 at Shanidar Cave. The results of typological analysis at Shanidar Cave suggest that assigning a particular tool industry to a particular hominin group may be problematic, which has implications for the wider region. The results of use-wear analysis suggest that there are no behavioural differences between MIS 5 hominins and MIS 3 hominins at Shanidar.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Liverpool John Moores University
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24377/ljmu.t.00029733
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Typology and Use-Wear of the Palaeolithic Stone Tools from the Recent Excavations (2015 to 2023) of Shanidar Cave (Iraqi Kurdistan)

M Hitchcock
1 links
Liverpool John Moores University
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Typology and Use-Wear of the Palaeolithic Stone Tools from the Recent Excavations (2015 to 2023) of Shanidar Cave (Iraqi Kurdistan)

M Hitchcock
article en

Abstract

Shanidar Cave, Iraqi Kurdistan, is among the most significant Neanderthal sites. Excavations by Ralph Solecki in the 1950s unearthed the remains of at least ten Neanderthals and associated Middle Palaeolithic Mousterian stone tools which have played a crucial role in our understanding of Neanderthal behaviour. Solecki also identified Upper Palaeolithic deposits containing Baradostian tools (broadly equivalent to the Aurignacian industry) separated from the Neanderthal layer by 1 metre of sediment, which he interpreted as reflecting a 10,000-year hiatus. Recent excavations (2015 – present) using single-context excavation, with three-dimensional plotting of all artefacts bigger than 2 cm, have improved our understanding of the site’s inhabitants. Lithics recovered from Shanidar Cave were identified and attributed to typological class. The results of typological analysis show that there is a contextual overlap between typologically Mousterian and Baradostian artefacts, and that there is no evidence for a hiatus in occupation at the site. Blades and bladelets, tool forms not usually associated with Neanderthals, were recovered from secure contexts dating to MIS 5a including from contexts containing Neanderthal skeletal remains. Use-wear analysis conducted using a DINO-LITE Edge digital microscope showed that 106 lithics retain evidence of use. The materials worked include wood, hide, meat and bone, bone, horn and plants. There is no significant difference in worked materials between MIS 5 and MIS 3 at Shanidar Cave. The results of typological analysis at Shanidar Cave suggest that assigning a particular tool industry to a particular hominin group may be problematic, which has implications for the wider region. The results of use-wear analysis suggest that there are no behavioural differences between MIS 5 hominins and MIS 3 hominins at Shanidar.

Liverpool John Moores University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon