Fidget and Sensory Toys for Anxiety and Emotional Regulation in Children: A Scoping Review With Implications for Pediatric Perioperative Care

BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological interventions are essential to reduce procedural anxiety in pediatric care. Fidget and sensory toys are widely used for distraction and self-regulation, yet evidence on their effectiveness remains fragmented. This scoping review mapped the evidence on fidget and sensory toys across general pediatric settings, with a focus on perioperative outcomes-such as anxiety, distress, and pain-to highlight relevant gaps in care. METHODS: This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL, complemented by trial registries, gray literature, citation tracking, and reference screening. Studies involving children (0-18 years) evaluating fidget or sensory toys in any setting were eligible. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. FINDINGS: Fifteen studies published between 2017 and 2026 met the inclusion criteria. Fidget spinners were the most frequently investigated device (n = 9), followed by stress balls (n = 3). Studies were conducted in educational (n = 8) and healthcare settings (n = 7). Educational studies generally reported limited or no benefits for attention, engagement, behavior, or academic performance. In contrast, healthcare studies generally suggested reductions in anxiety, pain, fear, and procedural distress, although findings were heterogeneous, and outcome measures varied substantially. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not support the routine use of fidget toys to improve attention or academic performance in educational settings. Evidence from healthcare and procedural settings suggests that fidget and sensory toys may be feasible distraction tools for selected pediatric patients, but evidence is insufficient to support routine perioperative use. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish standardized intervention protocols and identify the pediatric populations and clinical settings most likely to benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Anesthesia
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan.70327
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fidget and Sensory Toys for Anxiety and Emotional Regulation in Children: A Scoping Review With Implications for Pediatric Perioperative Care

Lucas Ferreira Gomes Pereira, Ricardo Vieira Carlos, Britta Sylvia von Ungern-Sternberg, Julia Ferreira Gomes Pereira et al.
1 links
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

Fidget and Sensory Toys for Anxiety and Emotional Regulation in Children: A Scoping Review With Implications for Pediatric Perioperative Care

Lucas Ferreira Gomes Pereira, Ricardo Vieira Carlos, Britta Sylvia von Ungern-Sternberg, Julia Ferreira Gomes Pereira, Vinícius Caldeira Quintão, Guilherme Silva Hirata de Souza, Nicolle de Souza Duarte
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological interventions are essential to reduce procedural anxiety in pediatric care. Fidget and sensory toys are widely used for distraction and self-regulation, yet evidence on their effectiveness remains fragmented. This scoping review mapped the evidence on fidget and sensory toys across general pediatric settings, with a focus on perioperative outcomes-such as anxiety, distress, and pain-to highlight relevant gaps in care. METHODS: This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL, complemented by trial registries, gray literature, citation tracking, and reference screening. Studies involving children (0-18 years) evaluating fidget or sensory toys in any setting were eligible. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. FINDINGS: Fifteen studies published between 2017 and 2026 met the inclusion criteria. Fidget spinners were the most frequently investigated device (n = 9), followed by stress balls (n = 3). Studies were conducted in educational (n = 8) and healthcare settings (n = 7). Educational studies generally reported limited or no benefits for attention, engagement, behavior, or academic performance. In contrast, healthcare studies generally suggested reductions in anxiety, pain, fear, and procedural distress, although findings were heterogeneous, and outcome measures varied substantially. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not support the routine use of fidget toys to improve attention or academic performance in educational settings. Evidence from healthcare and procedural settings suggests that fidget and sensory toys may be feasible distraction tools for selected pediatric patients, but evidence is insufficient to support routine perioperative use. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish standardized intervention protocols and identify the pediatric populations and clinical settings most likely to benefit.

Pediatric Anesthesia
Universidade de Taubaté (BR), The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Princess Margaret Hospital for Children (AU), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Perth Children's Hospital (AU)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Stan Perron Charitable Foundation, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon