The Last Defender of Liberal Democracy? ECOWAS’ Difficult Role as a Democratic Peacebuilder

Democracy has long been regarded as a constitutive part of the broader liberal peace project. Amid broader scepticism about the normative justification and the feasibility of adopting the liberal peace paradigm in the Global South, ECOWAS, with its explicit stance of both defending liberal democracy and linking it to peace, remained a strongly deviant case. Since the 2020s, a series of military coups and open challenges to liberal democracy have hit the organization massively. The paper asks why ECOWAS has failed to mobilize support for the defence of its normative framework, which has arguably, for many years, shaped peace operations and political dynamics in member states. A central component of this framework was to position democracy as a prerequisite for sustainable peace. The ECOWAS response to the Sahelian coups reflects the growing erosion of this underlying rationale in the organization’s normative framework. The analysis shows how changing contextual conditions since the 2010s invalidated the theoretical mechanisms underlying the nexus. Most ECOWAS member states struggled to maintain their democratic regimes, predominant regional conflicts were transnational, and the liberal international order was strongly contested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Peacekeeping
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2026.2753594
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Last Defender of Liberal Democracy? ECOWAS’ Difficult Role as a Democratic Peacebuilder

Christof Hartmann
1 links
International Peacekeeping
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

The Last Defender of Liberal Democracy? ECOWAS’ Difficult Role as a Democratic Peacebuilder

Christof Hartmann
article en

Abstract

Democracy has long been regarded as a constitutive part of the broader liberal peace project. Amid broader scepticism about the normative justification and the feasibility of adopting the liberal peace paradigm in the Global South, ECOWAS, with its explicit stance of both defending liberal democracy and linking it to peace, remained a strongly deviant case. Since the 2020s, a series of military coups and open challenges to liberal democracy have hit the organization massively. The paper asks why ECOWAS has failed to mobilize support for the defence of its normative framework, which has arguably, for many years, shaped peace operations and political dynamics in member states. A central component of this framework was to position democracy as a prerequisite for sustainable peace. The ECOWAS response to the Sahelian coups reflects the growing erosion of this underlying rationale in the organization’s normative framework. The analysis shows how changing contextual conditions since the 2010s invalidated the theoretical mechanisms underlying the nexus. Most ECOWAS member states struggled to maintain their democratic regimes, predominant regional conflicts were transnational, and the liberal international order was strongly contested.

International Peacekeeping
University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
University of Ghana
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Last Defender of Liberal Democracy? ECOWAS’ Difficult Role as a Democratic Peacebuilder — Christof Hartmann · International Peacekeeping (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS