Co-designing CKD Talk Topics, a structured agenda-setting intervention for people with chronic kidney disease: "Keep It Simple, Stupid"

Rationale & Objective: People with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) often face barriers to communication and self-advocacy, which may be mitigated by the practice of collaborative agenda-setting. We developed Chronic Kidney Disease Talk Topics (CKD Talk Topics), a structured agenda-setting intervention designed to help people with CKD and their care partners identify and communicate their discussion priorities during nephrology visits. Study Design: Following a literature review, we used a participatory design approach involving semi-structured interviews with patients (with care partners who attended), and clinicians to develop CKD Talk Topics Setting & Participants: Interviews occurred in a nephrology clinic in rural northern New England with patients that had advanced CKD (stages 4 and 5), some attending care partners, and clinicians. Analytical Approach: We used Framework Analysis to summarize suggested content, format, and structure, and participatory Practical Thematic Analysis to explore communication needs and expectations. Results: We interviewed 12 patients (with 4 accompanying care partners), and 8 clinicians. Overall, participants viewed CKD Talk Topics as a helpful tool. Patients emphasized simplicity, larger visual elements, CKD-specific content, and flexibility in usage. Clinicians noted the intervention's potential for patient-centered, efficient visits. The final tool features six plain-language topics: "Your Body," "Your Feelings," "What Matters to You," "Taking Care of Yourself," "What Happens Next," and "Everyday Needs." Limitations: Our findings may reflect the context of our clinic, which is in Northern New England with limited racial and ethnic diversity. Conclusions: The co-design process resulted in a simplified CKD Talk Topics intervention. These changes supported our goal: a patient-centered, structured agenda-setting tool to help people with advanced CKD and their care partners communicate priorities during nephrology visits. Feasibility testing is planned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.28.26366231
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Co-designing CKD Talk Topics, a structured agenda-setting intervention for people with chronic kidney disease: "Keep It Simple, Stupid"

Clay A. Block, Catherine H. Saunders, Hannah Crowe‐Cumella, Joseph P. Nano et al.
3 links
medRxiv
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
preprint

Co-designing CKD Talk Topics, a structured agenda-setting intervention for people with chronic kidney disease: "Keep It Simple, Stupid"

Clay A. Block, Catherine H. Saunders, Hannah Crowe‐Cumella, Joseph P. Nano, JoAnna K. Leyenaar, Ailyn Sierpe, Glyn Jones Elwyn, Niveditta Ramkumar, Geetha Ramkumar, Anji Zhu, Vanessa L. Junkins, Annika Milliman, Lorraine Gerraughty, Quenton Turner-Gee, Gabriela Sanders, Ishaan Kumar, Anne Dade, Gavin Henning, Steve L Bernstein, Ann O'Hare
preprint en

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: People with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) often face barriers to communication and self-advocacy, which may be mitigated by the practice of collaborative agenda-setting. We developed Chronic Kidney Disease Talk Topics (CKD Talk Topics), a structured agenda-setting intervention designed to help people with CKD and their care partners identify and communicate their discussion priorities during nephrology visits. Study Design: Following a literature review, we used a participatory design approach involving semi-structured interviews with patients (with care partners who attended), and clinicians to develop CKD Talk Topics Setting & Participants: Interviews occurred in a nephrology clinic in rural northern New England with patients that had advanced CKD (stages 4 and 5), some attending care partners, and clinicians. Analytical Approach: We used Framework Analysis to summarize suggested content, format, and structure, and participatory Practical Thematic Analysis to explore communication needs and expectations. Results: We interviewed 12 patients (with 4 accompanying care partners), and 8 clinicians. Overall, participants viewed CKD Talk Topics as a helpful tool. Patients emphasized simplicity, larger visual elements, CKD-specific content, and flexibility in usage. Clinicians noted the intervention's potential for patient-centered, efficient visits. The final tool features six plain-language topics: "Your Body," "Your Feelings," "What Matters to You," "Taking Care of Yourself," "What Happens Next," and "Everyday Needs." Limitations: Our findings may reflect the context of our clinic, which is in Northern New England with limited racial and ethnic diversity. Conclusions: The co-design process resulted in a simplified CKD Talk Topics intervention. These changes supported our goal: a patient-centered, structured agenda-setting tool to help people with advanced CKD and their care partners communicate priorities during nephrology visits. Feasibility testing is planned.

medRxiv
Dartmouth College (US), Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (US), Dartmouth Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon