Interspecific Cohabitation and Associated Zoonotic Risk in the Burrows of Niokolo‐Koba National Park, Senegal

ABSTRACT In arid and semi‐arid ecosystems, burrows serve as vital sanctuaries providing wildlife shelter, nourishment, and thermal buffering. These benefits attract multiple species into confined spaces, potentially facilitating interspecific pathogen transmission. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of burrow use in Senegal's Niokolo‐Koba National Park, quantifying interspecific cohabitation, identifying influential characteristics, and documenting the potential for zoonotic pathogen transmission. Data were collected during two dry‐season campaigns, which included semi‐opportunistic searches of burrows for camera‐trap monitoring and collection of fecal and tick samples. Cameras detected entering species while samples targeted bacteria with zoonotic potential. Across 1519 camera‐trap days, 32 species were detected using burrows, generating 172 interspecific cohabitations. Each cohabitation represented a species pair entering at least one common entrance during monitoring. An average of 6 different cohabitations per entrance over 20 days was recorded, with a maximum of 5 species visiting the same entrance within 24 h. Occupation occurred in rapid succession rather than simultaneously. Twenty significant preferential cohabitations were identified, ranging from ecological partnerships to predator–prey co‐occurrences. Based on the characteristics recorded for 105 monitored entrances, larger entrance diameter, higher woody cover, and location in valleys were associated with higher cohabitation rates. Pathogen screening detected potential zoonotic bacteria, including Treponema . Ticks were found in half of sampled burrows, with Francisella consistently detected. Results underline the dual ecological and epidemiological roles of burrows, emphasizing the need to integrate One Health considerations into burrow conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.74402
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interspecific Cohabitation and Associated Zoonotic Risk in the Burrows of Niokolo‐Koba National Park, Senegal

Mutien‐Marie Garigliany, Yves Brostaux, Cédric Vermeulen, JOHAN R. MICHAUX et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

Interspecific Cohabitation and Associated Zoonotic Risk in the Burrows of Niokolo‐Koba National Park, Senegal

Mutien‐Marie Garigliany, Yves Brostaux, Cédric Vermeulen, JOHAN R. MICHAUX, Fany Brotcorne, Simon Lhoest, Julie Bonnald, Mallé Gueye, Virginie Daelemans, Clara Russo, Justine Broers, Ousmane Alioune Sylla, Eric Heymans, Philippe Taminiaux, Paul Moïse Diedhiou
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In arid and semi‐arid ecosystems, burrows serve as vital sanctuaries providing wildlife shelter, nourishment, and thermal buffering. These benefits attract multiple species into confined spaces, potentially facilitating interspecific pathogen transmission. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of burrow use in Senegal's Niokolo‐Koba National Park, quantifying interspecific cohabitation, identifying influential characteristics, and documenting the potential for zoonotic pathogen transmission. Data were collected during two dry‐season campaigns, which included semi‐opportunistic searches of burrows for camera‐trap monitoring and collection of fecal and tick samples. Cameras detected entering species while samples targeted bacteria with zoonotic potential. Across 1519 camera‐trap days, 32 species were detected using burrows, generating 172 interspecific cohabitations. Each cohabitation represented a species pair entering at least one common entrance during monitoring. An average of 6 different cohabitations per entrance over 20 days was recorded, with a maximum of 5 species visiting the same entrance within 24 h. Occupation occurred in rapid succession rather than simultaneously. Twenty significant preferential cohabitations were identified, ranging from ecological partnerships to predator–prey co‐occurrences. Based on the characteristics recorded for 105 monitored entrances, larger entrance diameter, higher woody cover, and location in valleys were associated with higher cohabitation rates. Pathogen screening detected potential zoonotic bacteria, including Treponema . Ticks were found in half of sampled burrows, with Francisella consistently detected. Results underline the dual ecological and epidemiological roles of burrows, emphasizing the need to integrate One Health considerations into burrow conservation.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(11)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), University of Liège (BE), Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (BE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques et Ecosystèmes (FR), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Université de Thiès (SN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon