Managing the Dead, Governing the Living: Ritualization, Power, and the Water and Land Ritual in Korea

By examining the Water and Land Ritual in Korea from the fifteenth century to the present, this article challenges the conventional assumption that Buddhist ritual practice directly embodies the doctrinal principles of Buddhism. Drawing on ritual manuals, Buddhist scriptures, official historical records, and fieldwork observations, it adopts a historical-philosophical and practice-centered approach informed by Gregory Schopen’s critique of text-centrism and Catherine Bell’s theory of ritualization. The study argues that the ritual is best understood as a historically constructed and continuously reconfigured system shaped by the interaction of Buddhist concepts with traditional Chinese cosmology, Confucian ethics, and institutional interests. While the ritual incorporates ideas such as karma, rebirth, and merit-making, its performative structure often generates tensions with core Buddhist doctrines, including no-self and the limits of merit transfer. Rather than embodying doctrinal coherence, the ritual functions as a strategic practice that produces religious authority and mediates relations between the living and the dead. This analysis highlights the need to foreground practice, context, and power in the study of Buddhist ritual.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17111269
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing the Dead, Governing the Living: Ritualization, Power, and the Water and Land Ritual in Korea

Jongmyung Kim
2 links
Religions
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Managing the Dead, Governing the Living: Ritualization, Power, and the Water and Land Ritual in Korea

Jongmyung Kim
article en

Abstract

By examining the Water and Land Ritual in Korea from the fifteenth century to the present, this article challenges the conventional assumption that Buddhist ritual practice directly embodies the doctrinal principles of Buddhism. Drawing on ritual manuals, Buddhist scriptures, official historical records, and fieldwork observations, it adopts a historical-philosophical and practice-centered approach informed by Gregory Schopen’s critique of text-centrism and Catherine Bell’s theory of ritualization. The study argues that the ritual is best understood as a historically constructed and continuously reconfigured system shaped by the interaction of Buddhist concepts with traditional Chinese cosmology, Confucian ethics, and institutional interests. While the ritual incorporates ideas such as karma, rebirth, and merit-making, its performative structure often generates tensions with core Buddhist doctrines, including no-self and the limits of merit transfer. Rather than embodying doctrinal coherence, the ritual functions as a strategic practice that produces religious authority and mediates relations between the living and the dead. This analysis highlights the need to foreground practice, context, and power in the study of Buddhist ritual.

ReligionsVol. 17(11)
Geumgang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon