How Preschool Teachers Interpret and Respond to Competitive Play: Transformative and Compensatory Strategies

This study examines how preschool teachers interpret children’s emotional, behavioural, and interpersonal responses during competitive play and how these interpretations inform pedagogical action. Semi-structured interviews with twelve preschool teachers were analysed using codebook thematic analysis. Five interconnected themes were organised across three broader analytic domains: teachers’ interpretations of competitive situations, teacher-perceived child responses, and teachers’ pedagogical responses. These patterns were not treated as a fixed developmental sequence; rather, teachers’ accounts suggested that they were dynamically related and shaped by child-related and contextual influences, including sensitivity to competition, temperament, media exposure, parental attitudes, and classroom conditions. Teachers reported several transformative strategies, including emotional co-regulation, cognitive reframing, self-concept restoration, and structural regulation, alongside a less commonly reported compensatory strategy involving outcome alteration. Transformative strategies, such as emotional co-regulation and cognitive reframing, addressed children’s engagement with competitive experiences without altering the actual outcome, whereas compensatory strategies sought immediate emotional relief by modifying or re-presenting outcomes. This distinction reveals a central pedagogical and ethical tension between supporting children in processing competitive experiences and reducing distress by altering the outcome itself. Erikson’s initiative–guilt framework and Social Comparison Theory were used abductively to interpret teachers’ accounts of persistence, withdrawal, and peer comparison. Together, these perspectives illuminate how competitive play may make children’s initiatives socially visible and comparatively positioned. The study contributes a provisional interpretive framework of teacher decision-making and provides a basis for critical professional reflection and future observational and child-centred research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16112031
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Preschool Teachers Interpret and Respond to Competitive Play: Transformative and Compensatory Strategies

Sadiye Keleş, Tuğba Bilek
Behavioral Sciences
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

How Preschool Teachers Interpret and Respond to Competitive Play: Transformative and Compensatory Strategies

Sadiye Keleş, Tuğba Bilek
article en

Abstract

This study examines how preschool teachers interpret children’s emotional, behavioural, and interpersonal responses during competitive play and how these interpretations inform pedagogical action. Semi-structured interviews with twelve preschool teachers were analysed using codebook thematic analysis. Five interconnected themes were organised across three broader analytic domains: teachers’ interpretations of competitive situations, teacher-perceived child responses, and teachers’ pedagogical responses. These patterns were not treated as a fixed developmental sequence; rather, teachers’ accounts suggested that they were dynamically related and shaped by child-related and contextual influences, including sensitivity to competition, temperament, media exposure, parental attitudes, and classroom conditions. Teachers reported several transformative strategies, including emotional co-regulation, cognitive reframing, self-concept restoration, and structural regulation, alongside a less commonly reported compensatory strategy involving outcome alteration. Transformative strategies, such as emotional co-regulation and cognitive reframing, addressed children’s engagement with competitive experiences without altering the actual outcome, whereas compensatory strategies sought immediate emotional relief by modifying or re-presenting outcomes. This distinction reveals a central pedagogical and ethical tension between supporting children in processing competitive experiences and reducing distress by altering the outcome itself. Erikson’s initiative–guilt framework and Social Comparison Theory were used abductively to interpret teachers’ accounts of persistence, withdrawal, and peer comparison. Together, these perspectives illuminate how competitive play may make children’s initiatives socially visible and comparatively positioned. The study contributes a provisional interpretive framework of teacher decision-making and provides a basis for critical professional reflection and future observational and child-centred research.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(11)
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (TR), Mi̇lli̇ Eği̇ti̇m Bakanliği (TR)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon