Short- and long-read hybrid-capture viral metagenomics reach high sensitivity and specificity with data-driven cut-offs compared with routine diagnostics in CSF and BAL specimens

Background Hybrid-capture viral metagenomics improves sensitivity over untargeted metagenomics, but its performance across sequencing platforms and the definition of data-driven analysis cut-offs using real clinical samples have not been systematically evaluated. This study benchmarks the hybrid-capture workflow on mock and clinical specimens across short- and long-read platforms while introducing a new, reproducible approach for setting pathogen-calling cut-offs. Methods The Twist Comprehensive Viral Research Panel was used with both AVITI short-read and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read sequencing on 12 mock cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) external quality assessment (EQA) panel samples and on 14 CSF and 21 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) clinical specimens. Data-driven cut-offs for pathogen calling were derived using Latin hypercube sampling across genome coverage, abundance, and bleed-ratio parameters, then validated on the independent EQA datasets. Results After cut-off application, both platforms detected 22 of 23 expected viral targets in EQA samples (95.7% detection-level sensitivity) with 100% specificity in negative controls. In clinical specimens, AVITI corroborated 26 of 30 (86.7%) and ONT 25 of 30 (83.3%) routine viral detections while maintaining 100% diagnostic specificity. Sensitivity was 100% for CSF but lower in BAL, particularly for low viral load targets, and all detections below a Cq value of 32 were identified by both platforms. Metagenomics also identified a potentially clinically relevant pathogen not tested by routine testing in two CSF samples. Conclusion Hybrid-capture viral metagenomics performed comparably on AVITI and ONT for routine viral targets, with AVITI showing slightly higher genome recovery. In addition, the newly developed data-driven cut-off selection strategy offers a practical, reproducible method other laboratories can apply to their own workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.27.26366582
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Short- and long-read hybrid-capture viral metagenomics reach high sensitivity and specificity with data-driven cut-offs compared with routine diagnostics in CSF and BAL specimens

Stefanie Desmet, Lies Laenen, Mandy Bloemen, Jelle Matthijnssens et al.
4 links
medRxiv
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
preprint

Short- and long-read hybrid-capture viral metagenomics reach high sensitivity and specificity with data-driven cut-offs compared with routine diagnostics in CSF and BAL specimens

Stefanie Desmet, Lies Laenen, Mandy Bloemen, Jelle Matthijnssens, Marc A. Van Ranst, Elke Wollants, Lize Cuypers, Marthe Vanrenterghem, Annabel Rector, Justine Maes, Mustafa Karataş
preprint en

Abstract

Background Hybrid-capture viral metagenomics improves sensitivity over untargeted metagenomics, but its performance across sequencing platforms and the definition of data-driven analysis cut-offs using real clinical samples have not been systematically evaluated. This study benchmarks the hybrid-capture workflow on mock and clinical specimens across short- and long-read platforms while introducing a new, reproducible approach for setting pathogen-calling cut-offs. Methods The Twist Comprehensive Viral Research Panel was used with both AVITI short-read and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read sequencing on 12 mock cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) external quality assessment (EQA) panel samples and on 14 CSF and 21 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) clinical specimens. Data-driven cut-offs for pathogen calling were derived using Latin hypercube sampling across genome coverage, abundance, and bleed-ratio parameters, then validated on the independent EQA datasets. Results After cut-off application, both platforms detected 22 of 23 expected viral targets in EQA samples (95.7% detection-level sensitivity) with 100% specificity in negative controls. In clinical specimens, AVITI corroborated 26 of 30 (86.7%) and ONT 25 of 30 (83.3%) routine viral detections while maintaining 100% diagnostic specificity. Sensitivity was 100% for CSF but lower in BAL, particularly for low viral load targets, and all detections below a Cq value of 32 were identified by both platforms. Metagenomics also identified a potentially clinically relevant pathogen not tested by routine testing in two CSF samples. Conclusion Hybrid-capture viral metagenomics performed comparably on AVITI and ONT for routine viral targets, with AVITI showing slightly higher genome recovery. In addition, the newly developed data-driven cut-off selection strategy offers a practical, reproducible method other laboratories can apply to their own workflows.

medRxiv
Rega Institute for Medical Research (BE), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), Rega Foundation (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, KU Leuven
Good health and well-being
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon