Refinement of a formative assessment tool for an informed consent (EPA11) curriculum

Abstract Purpose Previous work found an informed consent curriculum and corresponding novel formative assessment tool for graduating fourth-year medical students preparing for a surgical-based residency to be effective based on student-performance and end-of-course-survey data. However, students underperformed on certain skills indicating the opportunity for refinement of the assessment tool. This study aims to identify and refine areas of the assessment tool used in the informed consent curriculum. Methods A total of 325 medical students across two-academic years (22–23, 23–24) received an informed consent curriculum. Students practiced a specialty-specific informed consent encounter with a standardized-patient (SP). Student performance was rated by the SP using a 22-line-item communication skills tool, using a defined rubric (scale 0, 1, 2) for each skill. SP-rated student performance data were tallied for each line-item. Student performance data was analyzed using an exploratory factor analysis (principal axis factoring with Promax rotation) and internal reliability test with IBM SPSS Version 30 statistical package. Results Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 22 communication skills. Sampling adequacy was acceptable (KMO = 0.66; Bartlett’s χ 2 (231) = 968.27, p < .001). The scree plot indicated retention of approximately three factors, and the initial eigenvalue criterion yielded eight factors explaining 34.8% of variance. Using a three-factor model, retained factors represented eight skills defined within dimensions of patient engagement, diagnosis education, and procedure explanation. Items with low loadings (loading < 0.40) were excluded. The three factors accounted for 20.91% of the variance. The Cronbach’s alpha for the 22-line-item skills assessment was acceptable (alpha = 0.660). Conclusions Exploratory factor analysis revealed three main constructs (patient-centered engagement, diagnosis education, and procedure explanation) of the informed consent formative assessment tool, indicating targetable areas for feedback to students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-026-00621-4
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refinement of a formative assessment tool for an informed consent (EPA11) curriculum

Ellen J. Hagopian, Gang Ren, Catherine A Cash
4 links
Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Refinement of a formative assessment tool for an informed consent (EPA11) curriculum

Ellen J. Hagopian, Gang Ren, Catherine A Cash
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Previous work found an informed consent curriculum and corresponding novel formative assessment tool for graduating fourth-year medical students preparing for a surgical-based residency to be effective based on student-performance and end-of-course-survey data. However, students underperformed on certain skills indicating the opportunity for refinement of the assessment tool. This study aims to identify and refine areas of the assessment tool used in the informed consent curriculum. Methods A total of 325 medical students across two-academic years (22–23, 23–24) received an informed consent curriculum. Students practiced a specialty-specific informed consent encounter with a standardized-patient (SP). Student performance was rated by the SP using a 22-line-item communication skills tool, using a defined rubric (scale 0, 1, 2) for each skill. SP-rated student performance data were tallied for each line-item. Student performance data was analyzed using an exploratory factor analysis (principal axis factoring with Promax rotation) and internal reliability test with IBM SPSS Version 30 statistical package. Results Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 22 communication skills. Sampling adequacy was acceptable (KMO = 0.66; Bartlett’s χ 2 (231) = 968.27, p < .001). The scree plot indicated retention of approximately three factors, and the initial eigenvalue criterion yielded eight factors explaining 34.8% of variance. Using a three-factor model, retained factors represented eight skills defined within dimensions of patient engagement, diagnosis education, and procedure explanation. Items with low loadings (loading < 0.40) were excluded. The three factors accounted for 20.91% of the variance. The Cronbach’s alpha for the 22-line-item skills assessment was acceptable (alpha = 0.660). Conclusions Exploratory factor analysis revealed three main constructs (patient-centered engagement, diagnosis education, and procedure explanation) of the informed consent formative assessment tool, indicating targetable areas for feedback to students.

Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical EducationVol. 5(1)
Queens Hospital Center (US), University of Toledo (US)
Quality education, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon