Assessment of light sensitivity using the Ocular Photosensitivity Analyzer: Discomfort threshold, pain threshold, and tolerance in healthy volunteers

Photophobia encompasses a continuum of light-induced experiences from mild discomfort to overt pain and intolerance, yet clinical tools rarely quantify these distinctions, leaving many patients undiagnosed and untreated. This study employed the Ocular Photosensitivity Analyzer (OPA), a compact instrument for quantitative sensory testing (QST) with light, to investigate three perceptual levels in healthy adults: visual photosensitivity discomfort threshold (VPDT), visual photosensitivity pain threshold (VPPT), and an exploratory outcome, visual photosensitivity tolerance level (VPTol). Twenty-nine participants ages 19-34 underwent standardized OPA testing, during which they identified when light first became uncomfortable, painful, and intolerable. After each trial, participants rated the peak pain intensity (PI) and peak unpleasantness (UP) using visual analog scales. Measured illuminance values differed significantly across the perceptual levels (RM-ANOVA, N = 28, F(1.69, 45.6)=37.06, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.58; Mauchly's W = 0.82, p = 0.072), indicating sensory levels are differentiable. Post hoc t-tests revealed VPTol exceeded VPPT (N = 28, t(27)=-2.29, p = 0.030, dz = 0.43)), and both exceeded VPDT (VPTol: N = 29, t(28)=-7.69, p < 0.001, dz = 1.43, VPPT: N = 29, t(27)=-7.69, p < 0.001, dz = 1.47). Friedman's test revealed UP (N = 28, χ2(2)=17.64, p < 0.001, Kendall's W = 0.32) and PI (N = 28, χ2(2)=22.36, p < 0.001, Kendall's W = 0.40) differences across perceptual levels and post hoc Wilcoxon tests showed UP and PI increased between VPDT and VPPT (UP: N = 29, Z = -4.34, p < 0.001, r = 0.57, PI: N = 29, Z = -4.58, p < 0.001, r = 0.60) and UP increased between VPDT and VPTol (N = 28, Z = -2.92, p = 0.007, r = 0.39), suggesting that both affective and sensory dimensions of pain vary across perceptual levels. Although preliminary, these findings are consistent with a multidimensional framework of photophobia. Additionally, the OPA's ability to differentially quantify VPDT, VPPT, and VPTol offers a novel approach to characterize light sensitivity that may aid future assessment of abnormal light sensitivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361637
Primary Topic
Ocular and Laser Science Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of light sensitivity using the Ocular Photosensitivity Analyzer: Discomfort threshold, pain threshold, and tolerance in healthy volunteers

Nicholas J. Pondelis, Jean-Marie A. Parel, Eric Alan Moulton, Heather A. Durkee et al.
4 links
PLoS ONE
Ocular and Laser Science Research
article

Assessment of light sensitivity using the Ocular Photosensitivity Analyzer: Discomfort threshold, pain threshold, and tolerance in healthy volunteers

Nicholas J. Pondelis, Jean-Marie A. Parel, Eric Alan Moulton, Heather A. Durkee, Cameron Talbert, Nathan Goturi, Vanda Faria, Mariela Caridad Aguilar, Alex González, Cornelis Rowaan
article en

Abstract

Photophobia encompasses a continuum of light-induced experiences from mild discomfort to overt pain and intolerance, yet clinical tools rarely quantify these distinctions, leaving many patients undiagnosed and untreated. This study employed the Ocular Photosensitivity Analyzer (OPA), a compact instrument for quantitative sensory testing (QST) with light, to investigate three perceptual levels in healthy adults: visual photosensitivity discomfort threshold (VPDT), visual photosensitivity pain threshold (VPPT), and an exploratory outcome, visual photosensitivity tolerance level (VPTol). Twenty-nine participants ages 19-34 underwent standardized OPA testing, during which they identified when light first became uncomfortable, painful, and intolerable. After each trial, participants rated the peak pain intensity (PI) and peak unpleasantness (UP) using visual analog scales. Measured illuminance values differed significantly across the perceptual levels (RM-ANOVA, N = 28, F(1.69, 45.6)=37.06, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.58; Mauchly's W = 0.82, p = 0.072), indicating sensory levels are differentiable. Post hoc t-tests revealed VPTol exceeded VPPT (N = 28, t(27)=-2.29, p = 0.030, dz = 0.43)), and both exceeded VPDT (VPTol: N = 29, t(28)=-7.69, p < 0.001, dz = 1.43, VPPT: N = 29, t(27)=-7.69, p < 0.001, dz = 1.47). Friedman's test revealed UP (N = 28, χ2(2)=17.64, p < 0.001, Kendall's W = 0.32) and PI (N = 28, χ2(2)=22.36, p < 0.001, Kendall's W = 0.40) differences across perceptual levels and post hoc Wilcoxon tests showed UP and PI increased between VPDT and VPPT (UP: N = 29, Z = -4.34, p < 0.001, r = 0.57, PI: N = 29, Z = -4.58, p < 0.001, r = 0.60) and UP increased between VPDT and VPTol (N = 28, Z = -2.92, p = 0.007, r = 0.39), suggesting that both affective and sensory dimensions of pain vary across perceptual levels. Although preliminary, these findings are consistent with a multidimensional framework of photophobia. Additionally, the OPA's ability to differentially quantify VPDT, VPPT, and VPTol offers a novel approach to characterize light sensitivity that may aid future assessment of abnormal light sensitivity.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of Miami (US), University of Miami Health System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ocular and Laser Science Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon